Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-30-2013, 08:58 PM
Bossman Bossman is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrKvothe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
OK, thank you. Realized how rude my post was after I submitted, so thank you for your polite response.

Would the GMs consider an agreement without TMO and/or FEIB's approval if BDA, Taken, AG, Europa, Divinity, etc. are all on board? Seems like at this point, FEIB and TMO might pull some Republican bullshit and shut everything down if we don't agree to their terms.
Honestly let them. These "elites" will be far more hurt from not raiding than us casual scum.
  #2  
Old 12-30-2013, 09:01 PM
Ecguy Ecguy is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 218
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrKvothe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
OK, thank you. Realized how rude my post was after I submitted, so thank you for your polite response.

Would the GMs consider an agreement without TMO and/or FEIB's approval if BDA, Taken, AG, Europa, Divinity, etc. are all on board? Seems like at this point, FEIB and TMO might pull some Republican bullshit and shut everything down if we don't agree to their terms.
Excluding the most hardcore raiders would have a lot of unintended consequences to any agreement. And it wouldn't really be an agreement either.
  #3  
Old 12-30-2013, 09:03 PM
phacemeltar phacemeltar is offline
Planar Protector

phacemeltar's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: western hemisphere
Posts: 1,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No, you guys all need to agree on something. As per Sirken's post, if an agreement isn't reached by the 2nd, everyone is raid suspended until you do.

We aren't going to 'sanction' anything until everyone is in agreement.
plz ban them
__________________
  #4  
Old 12-30-2013, 08:52 PM
Ecguy Ecguy is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 218
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrKvothe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So we're to take from this that this is the official new set of rules unless TMO and/or FEIB agree to another proposal? Despite them getting all of VP and 3/4 of Trak/VS/etc? This proposal is pretty much garbage, and it's pretty frustrating to see a GM propping it up before it's clear whether anyone outside of FE/IB (one raid, one voice?) and TMO are buying it.
Getting? They still have to compete. It's not a perfect proposal, but it's decent.
  #5  
Old 12-30-2013, 08:33 PM
DrKvothe DrKvothe is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 412
Default

So FE and IB are a single raiding team with 4 votes on the council?
__________________
Winga - 59 Barbarian Shaman <BDA>
Hairyporter - 29 Halfling Druid
  #6  
Old 12-30-2013, 08:34 PM
Yinikren Yinikren is offline
Fire Giant

Yinikren's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 591
Default

Also, I just saw what Yendor wrote - no poopsocking rule does nothing but cater to those who have an alt army they can leave at mobs - AKA the reason we are here in the first place.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by quido View Post
Look, I really want to make this better for the nonhardcores here. But if a small faction of people is going to cockblock progress because they're not getting exactly what they want.....
Abomination Snowman - 60 Grave Lord
Proud owner of Innoruuk's Curse that did NOT come from TMO's bank or RMT.
Niluvien Forestwalker - 52 Ranger
Russled Jimmies - 54 Wizard
  #7  
Old 12-30-2013, 08:36 PM
Ecguy Ecguy is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 218
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yinikren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Also, I just saw what Yendor wrote - no poopsocking rule does nothing but cater to those who have an alt army they can leave at mobs - AKA the reason we are here in the first place.
It does.
  #8  
Old 12-30-2013, 08:35 PM
DrKvothe DrKvothe is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 412
Default

Doesn't this just create 2 sets of the same problem we had before? One between FE/IB and TMO, another between BDA/Taken/etc.?
__________________
Winga - 59 Barbarian Shaman <BDA>
Hairyporter - 29 Halfling Druid
  #9  
Old 12-30-2013, 08:36 PM
Yinikren Yinikren is offline
Fire Giant

Yinikren's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 591
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrKvothe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Doesn't this just create 2 sets of the same problem we had before? One between FE/IB and TMO, another between BDA/Taken/etc.?
That's what I see. Whatever happened to this 50/50 hybrid point system FFA system I heard about? And why was a point system not considered given it is the most unbiased system of them all? Rogean wants mobs to be split between the majority of the guilds. This isn't a majority.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by quido View Post
Look, I really want to make this better for the nonhardcores here. But if a small faction of people is going to cockblock progress because they're not getting exactly what they want.....
Abomination Snowman - 60 Grave Lord
Proud owner of Innoruuk's Curse that did NOT come from TMO's bank or RMT.
Niluvien Forestwalker - 52 Ranger
Russled Jimmies - 54 Wizard
  #10  
Old 12-30-2013, 08:41 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yinikren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That's what I see. Whatever happened to this 50/50 hybrid point system FFA system I heard about? And why was a point system not considered given it is the most unbiased system of them all? Rogean wants mobs to be split between the majority of the guilds. This isn't a majority.
Oh does he? Let Rogean speak for himself. I HIGHLY doubt that was his intention haha.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.