Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-08-2013, 05:05 PM
mishurza mishurza is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 97
Default

My raid force was engaging. Are you going to dodge answering my question Merkk? Why did one of your raid leaders instruct Imba to run CT away from our engage?

Last time I tried to have a conversation with you I started by complementing your PD kill the week before, since it was very well executed. You responded by insulting me and ninja logging. As far back as we go I thought I deserved a little more than that.
__________________
Blue:
Tawisty McBardovich (60 Bard)
Aalamar Bundy (60 Enchanter)
Ghomie (60 Wizard)
Jurassic Park (60 Necromancer)
Massterr Drumok (56 Monk)
Leighdybierd Johansen (50 Cleric)
Gdavid (50 Magician)
Snique Sniq(28 Rogue)
Therbah (7 bank)

Red:
Aalamar (60 Enchanter)
Aalasbank (1 bank)
  #2  
Old 12-08-2013, 04:28 PM
HeallunRumblebelly HeallunRumblebelly is offline
Planar Protector

HeallunRumblebelly's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roanoke, Indiana
Posts: 1,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prismaticshop [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Since Imba from FE/IB got the first FTE, then TMO, FE/IB disengaged, why didn't TMO engage, because CT got trained away ?

On the second engage, FE/IB has FTE, CT is trained away as well yet they engaged it nonetheless and killed it.

Same thing happened for both guilds, the GMs call is retarded.

Not that I'm really blaming you guys, it really is a shit show to manage so I guess at some point you guys need to put someone in the penalty box. But FE/IB did kill CT on their FTE, with their raid force.
I'm just confused that the GMs actively prefer this situation over literally any other set of raid rules. Like some teenage girls feeling off drama :P
  #3  
Old 12-08-2013, 10:09 PM
Furniture Furniture is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2011
Location: ny
Posts: 441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeallunRumblebelly [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm just confused that the GMs actively prefer this situation over literally any other set of raid rules. Like some teenage girls feeling off drama :P

I agree, these FTE rules do nothing but start a circus of bullshit and petty drama as evident by this thread.
  #4  
Old 12-08-2013, 04:38 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prismaticshop [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Since Imba from FE/IB got the first FTE, then TMO, FE/IB disengaged, why didn't TMO engage, because CT got trained away ?

On the second engage, FE/IB has FTE, CT is trained away as well yet they engaged it nonetheless and killed it.

Same thing happened for both guilds, the GMs call is retarded.

Not that I'm really blaming you guys, it really is a shit show to manage so I guess at some point you guys need to put someone in the penalty box. But FE/IB did kill CT on their FTE, with their raid force.
Its hard to engage a mob that is chasing someone who is Low HP kiting.
Simple facts FE's actions prevented TMO's ability to kill CT on our engage. If anyone doubts TMO can kill CT with 43 people.... join <Tinfoil Hat>
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #5  
Old 12-08-2013, 04:28 PM
Visual Visual is offline
Fire Giant

Visual's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 751
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Encounter log + fraps you guys provided.
That is my favorite part. The most damning evidence is something they posted in their defense.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #6  
Old 12-08-2013, 04:21 PM
Yapas Yapas is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Grass land
Posts: 81
Default

Following streaming it was confusion on FE/IB Vent. Shinko probably mad cause we got FTE and stole CT.

Once again Corova you failed.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #7  
Old 12-08-2013, 04:39 PM
Yapas Yapas is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Grass land
Posts: 81
Default

Yeah Merkk you made another thread for nothing except showing that FE/IB still not have learnt from their past mistakes
  #8  
Old 12-08-2013, 04:44 PM
Lammy Lammy is offline
Fire Giant

Lammy's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 548
Default

I like Merkk, he's a nice guy outside of raid scene. But this is beyond delusional .
__________________
  #9  
Old 12-08-2013, 04:49 PM
kotton05 kotton05 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,728
Default

i posted our engage, didn't say anything but you sniped fte without a raid force right on ct unlike ours, how is it that hard to understand.
  #10  
Old 12-08-2013, 04:57 PM
mishurza mishurza is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 97
Default

Well I don't know about your raid force but the crew that was with me at NE corner was perfectly capable of killing CT. Why does one of your raid leaders say in vent that your MT should run away from our engage with our mob?
__________________
Blue:
Tawisty McBardovich (60 Bard)
Aalamar Bundy (60 Enchanter)
Ghomie (60 Wizard)
Jurassic Park (60 Necromancer)
Massterr Drumok (56 Monk)
Leighdybierd Johansen (50 Cleric)
Gdavid (50 Magician)
Snique Sniq(28 Rogue)
Therbah (7 bank)

Red:
Aalamar (60 Enchanter)
Aalasbank (1 bank)
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.