Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Bugs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-22-2014, 01:52 PM
tristantio tristantio is offline
Fire Giant

tristantio's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 888
Default

No problem! Also please note in the avoidance section (parry/dodge/riposte/miss/hit) those are percents of the total hits, meaning "Hit for: 43.21993" means that mobs actually hit my guy 43% of the time or so.
__________________
Realtime auction logger: http://ahungry.com/eqauctions/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-31-2014, 01:25 PM
Splorf22 Splorf22 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tristantio [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
science
Hmm, maybe I was just unlucky? Or maybe there are some strange cap/level issues at play?
__________________
Raev | Loraen | Sakuragi <The A-Team> | Solo Artist Challenge | Farmer's Market
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arteker
in words of anal fingers, just a filthy spaniard
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-23-2014, 02:00 PM
Jimjam Jimjam is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,800
Default

There is a lvl 20 froglok (rogue?) spawn that can be triggered in misty thicket. Since his level/class is always the same this mob might be useful for testing AC effectiveness.

It would be interesting to see a parse of him against high/low ac against characters of various levels at both high and low AC set ups.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-31-2014, 02:14 PM
tristantio tristantio is offline
Fire Giant

tristantio's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 888
Default

It might be, what con was the mob you fought?

I'd be interseted in seeing how your data parses out with the parser I put together for my own analysis.

Can you send me your logs, or parse with the script I put together for this (requires *nix or cygwin on windows, as it is a bash script)?

https://github.com/ahungry/p99-patch...mage-parser.sh

Edit: Maybe tonight I'll try out some other parses, such as the effect of AC when tanking many greens (although this would be easier if I had a bard to do it with).

If anyone at all wants to send me logs for comparison, feel free to PM me them and I'll post the parse results.
__________________
Realtime auction logger: http://ahungry.com/eqauctions/
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-10-2014, 10:53 AM
Solb Solb is offline
Kobold

Solb's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 106
Default

So I am curious, what ever happened out of all of this? Is there a new updated thread on Armor Class explaining how effective it is/is not? Was there ever any "fix', or conclusion to this dilemma?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-10-2014, 03:10 PM
Trax Trax is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 188
Default

Any AC over 800'ish, doesn't seem to have any effect at all. Especially against raid targets.

AC seems to only work well against green con mobs.

I'll parse it today and report back so people stop thinking AC is working as intended.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-10-2014, 05:35 PM
Trax Trax is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 188
Default

Quote:
Perun level 60 Monk vs. A Cliff Golem level 58 Warrior
Fight duration – 3minutes.


584 AC Perun --- Total damage: 10481 --- Avg hit: 161 --- Swings: 149 --- Defended: 41 (27.5%) --- Hit: 65 (43.6%) --- Missed: 43 (28.9%) --- Accuracy: 60.2% --- Dodged: 6 (5.3%) --- Parried: 0 (0%) --- Blocked: 29 (19.5%) --- Riposted: 6 (5%) --- Absorbed: 0 (0%)

815 AC Perun --- Total damage: 7312 --- Avg hit: 109 --- Swings: 150 --- Defended: 41 (27.3%) --- Hit: 67 (44.7%) --- Missed: 42 (28%) --- Accuracy: 61.5% --- Dodged: 9 (7.6%) --- Parried: 0 (0%) --- Blocked: 28 (18.7%) --- Riposted: 4 (3.3%) --- Absorbed: 0 (0%)

906 AC Perun --- Total damage: 6500 --- Avg hit: 114 --- Swings: 150 --- Defended: 54 (36%) --- Hit: 57 (38%) --- Missed: 39 (26%) --- Accuracy: 59.4% --- Dodged: 13 (11.9%) --- Parried: 0 (0%) --- Blocked: 32 (21.3%) --- Riposted: 9 (7.6%) --- Absorbed: 0 (0%)

1080-1100 AC Perun --- Total damage: 7340 --- Avg hit: 101 --- Swings: 153 --- Defended: 40 (26.1%) --- Hit: 72 (47.1%) --- Missed: 41 (26.8%) --- Accuracy: 63.7% --- Dodged: 4 (3.4%) --- Parried: 0 (0%) --- Blocked: 29 (19%) --- Riposted: 7 (5.6%) --- Absorbed: 0 (0%)
Link to video - http://youtu.be/Abb6yA31ohs

As you can see between 600ac and 800ac there is a noticeable improvement in mitigation. However, after 800ac it's a marginal difference. When tanking raid targets, there is little to no difference between 800ac and 1,000ac. Also consider the random number generator factor.
Last edited by Trax; 02-10-2014 at 05:49 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-10-2014, 06:11 PM
heartbrand heartbrand is offline
Planar Protector

heartbrand's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The Wire
Posts: 9,758
Default

this is INCREDIBLY important that it be fixed for velious
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-10-2014, 06:44 PM
Trax Trax is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 188
Default

We actually need to be able to resist AE's other than MR based spells, before Velious is launched.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-10-2014, 09:21 PM
Trax Trax is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 188
Default

Will be doing more test trials later.

Plan is same ac values, 5minute fights. 5 sets of each.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:52 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.