|
|
#72
06-02-2013, 02:10 AM
|
|||
|
ITT: People who don't understand the concept of crimes of opportunity
Also the perpetuation of the alcohol defending culture of Amurika. Luckily for everyone (including yourselves) your interaction with the real world is minimum. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#73
06-02-2013, 02:16 AM
|
|||
|
what does a crime of opportunity have to do with anything? if you leave your front door unlocked and get hatcheted to death, you are not liable. and yet, the crime may never have happened if you had locked your door.
you're throwing around legal jargon you don't understand and drawing ridiculous parallels where they don't exist passing out drunk and getting raped is not in any way comparable to driving drunk, aside from the obvious connection to alcohol | ||
|
|
|||
|
#74
06-02-2013, 02:33 AM
|
|||
|
So anyway, the point is that nobody should tell jokes about rape, because that shit is fucked up. Comedians shouldn't do it, neither should you.
BECAUSE You're hurting someone. Nearly 100,000 women report penis-in-vagina rape every year in this country. 16% of women who are penis-in-vagina raped report their experience. We're looking at more like half a million penis-in-vagina rapes per year, in this country. None of those statistics consider other forms of molestation. 1 in 5 women have been raped. That means that statistically speaking, 2 people posting in this thread have mothers that were raped.
__________________
 | ||
|
|
|||
|
#76
06-02-2013, 02:35 AM
|
|||
|
They both involve a choice and the one throwing legal jargon around is you.
You don't choose to drink and drive, you choose to get drunk and impair your judgement and while judgement is impaired you decide to drive. Legality or not, it's stupid and the situation was allowed to happen because of the choice to get drunk and have their judgement impared. The person drinking is responsible for what happened because of their negligence. This we agree upon. You don't choose to get drunk and get raped, you choose to get drunk and impair your ability to resist someone taking advantage of you. Legality or not it's stupid and the situation was allowed to happen because of the choice to get drunk and have their ability to resist impared. Because there is another person involved the other person is 100% to blame and you don't see any negligence whatsoever on the drinker. This is the point of contention and you are ignoring many obvious parallels. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#77
06-02-2013, 02:37 AM
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#78
06-02-2013, 02:38 AM
|
||||
|
Quote:
Next you'll be trying to censor dead baby jokes. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | |||
|
|
||||
|
#79
06-02-2013, 02:38 AM
|
||||
|
hbb im a bit disappointed you only pulled statistics of men raping women, what about men raping men or women raping men women raping women.
tell me hbb, what do you have against men!?
__________________
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#80
06-02-2013, 02:39 AM
|
||||
|
Quote:
If not then please tell me what you are implying. | |||
|
|
||||
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
