Since when was trak a vp dragon? WTF IS TMO DOING

[47shadesofgay]

Young Earth Creationist Philosopher is perhaps more appropriate.

Or we can just go with dumbass. Ya let's go with that. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Hackscendence]

Originally Posted by 47shadesofgay [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Young Earth Creationist Philosopher is perhaps more appropriate.

Or we can just go with dumbass. Ya let's go with that. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Agreed.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Hackscendence [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Agreed.

Originally Posted by Rellapse10 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Random attack here

When you can no longer argue a point logically, resort to ad hominem fallacies. Good Job!

[Rellapse10]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Fact: i called the early engage.
Fact: i did not stop my guild members from engaging in griefing tactics.

[Hackscendence]

Me and Alarti are at work getting paid to forum warrior atm. If there's a better way to spend the time between emails/meetings I'd like to hear it.

For now, I'll add that Logic does not posit that an absolute truth does or ever will exist, it's merely the path to the most reasonable explanation based on what can be ascertained beyond a reasonable doubt.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Hackscendence [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Me and Alarti are at work getting paid to forum warrior atm. If there's a better way to spend the time between emails/meetings I'd like to hear it.

For now, I'll add that Logic does not posit that an absolute truth does or ever will exist, it's merely the path to the most reasonable explanation based on what can be ascertained beyond a reasonable doubt.

Logic has you analyze and compare facts for a most appropriate hypothesis, you did not do this. You took 2 very basic facts and tried to explain a situation that those facts could in no way explain.

[Servellious]

I remember last year BDA and vd merged and Tmo started losing trak and they started doing desperate moves like this and then finally got themselves raid suspended looks like the desperation has set it again and that fuck over anyone or any guild to get my pixels mentality is back in full effect.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Servellious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I remember last year BDA and vd merged and Tmo started losing trak and they started doing desperate moves like this and then finally got themselves raid suspended looks like the desperation has set it again and that fuck over anyone or any guild to get my pixels mentality is back in full effect.

I remember that Amelinda hated TMO and Bisch was a GM who hate TMO also, he also constantly pushed for TMO's suspension.

Oh memories.

[Aviann]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You took 2 very basic facts and tried to explain a situation that those facts could in no way explain.

This is funny.

[Hackscendence]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Logic has you analyze and compare facts for a most appropriate hypothesis, you did not do this. You took 2 very basic facts and tried to explain a situation that those facts could in no way explain.

I have no facts based on server logs, so the only ones I'm able to work from are as follows:

TMO engaged trak first
Trak Shrooms the first to engage

Your claim was that FE trained themselves covertly with an FD class in the shroom lair. I discarded that explanation given the numbers we had ready to engage and the FACTS that you engaged first so you had someone in the shroom lair at the time. It would require surmountable evidence to prove a claim like that.

You don't usually require many facts to explain a rather reasonable causation. Asking us for fraps to prove your fail engage lasted 20 minutes is unreasonable when the only other explanation would be that we chose to train ourselves despite sufficient numbers and no wipe. We should be asking you for fraps to prove that you didn't.

Either way, you talk a big talk, but what you're describing is not logical, reasonable thought. It's a crackpot tin-foil hat theory at best, ignorance of your own personal experience at worst.