Quote:
Originally Posted by Erasong
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I pretty much got from that quote that it may be that as a player the GM's would want FFA but they recognize how its not really possible currently. Pretty much from the first line or two from the quote. Not trying to go 1 for 1 with ya just defending my original position that the saber rattling of FFA! FUCK YEAH! isnt helping. I seriously doubt that it would happen and im in the camp that wish it would. I truly believe this suicide kings method is a fair compromise ( comprimise? w/e i suck at spelling ).
|
I like ya man, you're a good guy. I just don't agree on this. What may seem fair to some is the direct opposite of what many others would like to see. It would be a compromise no doubt. But a fair compromise? Hardly.
And I should clarify I guess when I say "FFA" I have been referring to first to engage, that is just how we always referred. Now I'm understanding people are calling "ffa" just everyone engaging and the ultimate victor would be the group with the most dps. That is just silly.
But yeah, can first to engage work? I would imagine as easy as any other raid rules would work to include this one proposed. There will always be someone who has a problem with it. And as I stated earlier, I personally would never be in support of any form or variation of a rotation. And I know there are many who would agree with that. It eliminates the competition, and is no fun.
Nice work on the proposal. I know you worked hard and it's very well organized and makes great sense for what you are trying to accomplish.
But like I said, I don't agree with it at all.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
06-24-2010, 05:31 PM
Linear Mode
