The absolute state of AI results.

[BradZax]

I didn't even read the paper

Then who are you talking to?

That's literally what the graph is

No its what someone who didn't read the paper would think though.

this is the same company

That's stock including splits is roughly $7,300 per share today.

smart people can be retarded and have views on super ai gonna kill us all or turn the entire universe into paperclips,

Cool, but nobody in this context is calming that.

If anything I pointed out that they are going to cause the end of the world by destabilizing politics in the USA and globally if anyone thought that was true and wanted to stop them from developing AGI.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[BradZax]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Maybe ask ai if that's a fair comparison, point 3 is wrong also, you can totally put 5.1 in a harness and it would score higher point 1 lol wut when did I say the harness is where the performance is coming from, this entire output is garbage I can only imagine what kind of fucked up prompt you put in to get this to be spit out and be this confused, try Claude or Chatgpt not grok or Google overviewI

OK: "read [this discussion] and [this document] and respond in kind."

The METR chart isn't misleading at all, and you're fundamentally misinterpreting the entire thesis of the DeepMind paper. You are trying to separate the core model from the software harness, but in the real world, they are the same system.

The paper explicitly states that raw base model scaling is slowing down, which is why the industry has shifted to test-time compute, software scaffolding, and multi-agent systems. The harness and the tools are the new scaling paradigm.

Furthermore, your claim that you can just stick an older model like Opus in a modern harness for days to get the same results is technically wrong. Older models lack the context windows and the architectural stability required to handle long-horizon reasoning tasks. If you run them that long, they suffer from compounding errors, hallucinate, and crash. The ability to effectively utilize extended runtime and scaffolding is a direct capability of the newer model architectures. The chart isn't a trick; it's showing the reality of how AI systems scale now.

Enjoy arguing with AI while you say that AI isn't going to become AGI/ASI anytime soon.

Ill be kicking back playing everquest.

[Ekco]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nvidia has announced a warm-water cooling system that it says can dramatically reduce the amount of water a data center uses, eliminating “pretty much all water usage” inside the data center.

[BradZax]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Now I am anti ai datacenter so we make a law that says we can only build them in space and my SpaceX stock will go to orbit then the moon then mars.

Nvidia has announced a warm-water cooling system that it says can dramatically reduce the amount of water a data center uses, eliminating “pretty much all water usage” inside the data center.

almonds: still -1.4 trillion gallons a year in a desert state suffering from wildfires.

[Botten]

nuclear clocks just become a better reality.

A nuclear‑clock‑level time source would basically make everyday tech run more smoothly and more accurately. GPS would be more precise, phones and computers would stay perfectly in sync, smart home devices would trigger at the exact right moment, and things like video calls, gaming, and streaming would have fewer timing‑related problems.

Even health trackers, VR and cameras would get small but noticeable improvements because their sensors rely on precise timing.

A nuclear‑grade clock could improve pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

nuclear clocks just become a better reality.

A nuclear‑clock‑level time source would basically make everyday tech run more smoothly and more accurately. GPS would be more precise, phones and computers would stay perfectly in sync, smart home devices would trigger at the exact right moment, and things like video calls, gaming, and streaming would have fewer timing‑related problems.

Even health trackers, VR and cameras would get small but noticeable improvements because their sensors rely on precise timing.

A nuclear‑grade clock could improve pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic.

Bro it's just a quartz crystal bro get a new one.

[Ekco]

>not using the cosmic spin of a dead star to tell time
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSR_J0437%E2%88%924715

[Ekco]

Morgan Stanley doubling its China humanoid robot shipment forecast to 50,000 units this year (up from 28k, originally 14k in Jan) signals that commercialization is accelerating faster than expected.

this is probably fine

[Ekco]

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thorium? The most famously toxic actinide?

It goes on my wrist?