Myconid Spore King - Monk Solo

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think there should be a SAC category for unbuffed solo kills.

I think we're in agreement. Thank you for confirming.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think we're in agreement. Thank you for confirming.

There is not common agreement about a separate SAC category, at least in it's implementation and intent.

But there is something we can all agree on, which is good:

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're [Samoht] clearly trying to downplay and denigrate Stryker's achievement and I want nothing to do with that.

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think we're in agreement. Thank you for confirming.

Glad to hear you agree it was an impressive solo kill, under restrictions that are as hard for a monk to do as possible.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Glad to hear you agree it was an impressive solo kill, under restrictions that are as hard for a monk to do as possible.

And changes to the SAC are imperative moving forward.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And changes to the SAC are imperative moving forward.

It is amusing you claim they are imperative moving forward now, even though you had no interest in the page for years.

I am also glad to hear you finally decided to give credit to OP, which he fully deserves. It only took 76 pages.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It is amusing you claim they are imperative moving forward now, even though you had no interest in the page for years.

I am also glad to hear you finally decided to give credit to OP, which he fully deserves. It only took 76 pages.

Please believe me when I say that your drivel had zero impact on this thread. If anything it has only hindered intelligent conversation and caused OP to lash out unnecessarily.

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It is amusing you claim they are imperative moving forward now, even though you had no interest in the page for years.

I am also glad to hear you finally decided to give credit to OP, which he fully deserves. It only took 76 pages.

I gotta say DSM, it's also amusing that I got him to agree it was an impressive solo kill in only a handful of replies, while your multiple hundreds of post produced nothing but sound, fury, and a wiki suspension.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I gotta say DSM, it's also amusing that I got him to agree it was an impressive solo kill in only a handful of replies, while your multiple hundreds of post produced nothing but sound, fury, and a wiki suspension.

You clearly didn't read the thread if you think this is the case. You are just injecting your normal personal attacks against me.

I am not sure why you think you are the sole contributor here.

You just proved my methodology works. If enough people stand up to the trolls, they give up. Honestly I do thank you for tipping the scales. You did help.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It is honestly silly to take credit for other posters cornering Samoht.

There are no corners in your circular logic.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There are no corners in your circular logic.

Let's just be glad you agree OP's video is awesome, and you admit your attempts to downplay OP's achivements were wrong. It only took 76 pages and Samoht trolling the wiki multiple times for him to reply on topic and move on. You could have done this page 1.