Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #721  
Old 09-06-2025, 01:29 PM
Xathos53 Xathos53 is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 2
Default Link for the Court Docs

Quote:
Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
got any links? I want to read about it too.
Yes, here is where I am reading court docs regarding the case.
Daybreak Game Company LLC vs. Takahashi

No new docs have been filed since September 2nd.
Reply With Quote
  #722  
Old 09-06-2025, 01:31 PM
Xathos53 Xathos53 is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 2
Default

I have always thought DBG would win the case from Day One. The THJ folks just got greedy and that is something DBG cannot allow or they won't win any cases like this in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #723  
Old 09-06-2025, 02:20 PM
shovelquest shovelquest is online now
Planar Protector

shovelquest's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 3,736
Default

DBG cared about how THJ had a higher concurrent player base on an everquest server since the early 2000's.

Especially after their TLP launch flopped 1 month before the lawsuit.

The only greedy people here are DBG.

Good business would have been to host the THJ server on DBG servers and aquire the devs and make everyone happy.

But DBG got greedy.

THJ just made a better game.
__________________
I am a highly open and reflective and conscientious individual with moderate to low agreeableness and a moderate level of emotional reactivity/sensitivity.
Reply With Quote
  #724  
Old 09-06-2025, 02:33 PM
Duik Duik is offline
Planar Protector

Duik's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Near the largest canyon in the world!
Posts: 2,852
Default

The defendants claim by playing EverQuest and agreeing to the EULA, any disputes shall be resolved via arbitration.
This seems to be true and neither party disagrees.

Having not actually read it, Im sure it says somewhere "While playing on DNGs official servers these arbitration sessions shall occur" now im no lawyer but an EMU server isnt in fact and official server.
I'm predicting a punch in the face incomming for KRISTOHASHI &
ALEXALOR.
Reply With Quote
  #725  
Old 09-06-2025, 03:30 PM
shovelquest shovelquest is online now
Planar Protector

shovelquest's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 3,736
Default

Yeah I have no clue who will win but I have a feeling daybreak games is literally as inept at law as they are at game development.
__________________
I am a highly open and reflective and conscientious individual with moderate to low agreeableness and a moderate level of emotional reactivity/sensitivity.
Reply With Quote
  #726  
Old 09-06-2025, 04:40 PM
Tann Tann is offline
Planar Protector

Tann's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,099
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The only greedy people here are DBG
Lol wut... the only reason this lawsuit is even happening is because of all the money THJ was vacuuming in on the daily. Noone gives a shit about concurrent players, it's all about $$$.

THJ got greedy, there would be no lawsuit had these twats not ran an RMT cashshop.
__________________
< Knights Who Say Ni >
Qeynos questing and leveling (all quests nerfed) | Off the beaten path 24-40.
Reply With Quote
  #727  
Old 09-06-2025, 04:44 PM
shovelquest shovelquest is online now
Planar Protector

shovelquest's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 3,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tann [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Lol wut... the only reason this lawsuit is even happening is because of all the money THJ was vacuuming in on the daily. Noone gives a shit about concurrent players, it's all about $$$.

THJ got greedy, there would be no lawsuit had these twats not ran an RMT cashshop.
the lawsuit wasn't "we lost money" it was "irreparable harm"

the money is what allowes them to make the lawsuit happen.

They dont care about like two hundi's the THJ devs can buy with their profits.

Its the HARM that is being done to their brand.

Which is ironically the lawsuit is much more harm on their brand than the humiliation they went through with the fangbreaker flop.
__________________
I am a highly open and reflective and conscientious individual with moderate to low agreeableness and a moderate level of emotional reactivity/sensitivity.
Reply With Quote
  #728  
Old 09-07-2025, 12:50 AM
Reiwa Reiwa is offline
Planar Protector

Reiwa's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 5,809
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
the lawsuit wasn't "we lost money" it was "irreparable harm"

the money is what allowes them to make the lawsuit happen.

They dont care about like two hundi's the THJ devs can buy with their profits.

Its the HARM that is being done to their brand.

Which is ironically the lawsuit is much more harm on their brand than the humiliation they went through with the fangbreaker flop.
Have the last 3? expansions had any new art or models?

It doesn't count as publishing if you copy paste your previous works.
__________________
Ceterum autem censeo Denver esse delendam.
Reply With Quote
  #729  
Old 09-07-2025, 01:57 AM
Ekco Ekco is offline
Planar Protector

Ekco's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Felwithe
Posts: 4,434
Default

they got new assets for the expanisons, they pay someone on www.fiverr.com 20bucks for each expansion i'm pretty sure.
__________________
Ekco - 60 Wiz // Oshieh - 60 Dru // Kusanagi - 53 Pal // Losthawk - 52 Rng // Baiken - 33 Mnk // Tiltuesday - EC mule
Reply With Quote
  #730  
Old 09-07-2025, 10:40 AM
Irespectwomen Irespectwomen is offline
Large Rat


Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zelld52 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Honestly, the argument is solid from THJ lawyers. In the Daybreak EULA it clearly states that "any dispute" will be handled by arbitration - and doesn't make any exceptions, (ie: IP infringement)

Bold move, Cotton - let's see how it plays out
A dispute while still reasonably within the parameters of the EULA. I don't think it makes much sense to legally bind one side to any clause of a contract when that contract has been egregiously ignored and broken by the other side.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.