Myconid Spore King - Monk Solo

[loramin]

And to be clear, I don't care what you post: argue that X is or isn't a viable solo target. I truly don't care which.

Just post honestly and genuinely.

[loramin]

Maybe you haven't noticed, but this forum has trolls. They aren't going away, even if they do hurt your feelings.

Be a big boy like all the other rational posters in the forum: ignore the trolls.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Maybe you haven't noticed, but this forum has trolls. They aren't going away, even if they do hurt your feelings.

Be a big boy and ignore the trolls.

So you endorse trolling the wiki then simply because trolls exist? Either you think Zuranthium and Samoht didn't troll the wiki, or you think they did but you don't care. Remember you are a wiki admin. Which one is it?

[loramin]

No, I endorse only punishing someone when it's 100% clear to me they knew they shouldn't be doing what they were doing.

Those two edited a page that invited everyone to edit it. If you could get punished for editing a wiki page that invites you to edit it, how could that possibly be fair? Its like some kind of "gotcha" trap.

But consider another example: you knew no one wanted to read Zura's post in the wiki. You also knew Zura didn't want it there. And I know you knew, because I saw you undo his attempt to remove it eight times in the wiki history.

Does that clarify the difference for you?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, I endorse only punishing someone when it's 100% clear to me they knew they shouldn't be doing what they were doing.

Those two edited a page that invited everyone to edit it. If you could get punished for editing a wiki page that invites you to edit it, how could that possibly be fair? Its like some kind of "gotcha" trap.

But consider another example: you knew no one wanted to read Zura's post in the wiki. You also knew Zura didn't want it there. And I know you knew, because I saw you undo his attempt to remove it eight times in the wiki history.

Does that clarify the difference for you?

Two things. The first thing is I caught you in yet another lie:

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

3) Falsely sincere disengenuous poster - you engage in conversations to prove your brilliance and win forum fights, but when a disagreement arises there is zero chance you will listen to the other side: in fact, if they present more logical evidence, you will just double down on stupid, and keep arguing against that logic no matter what.

Recently Zuranthium specifically called out a flaw in my DPS calculator. I found out it was true, and fixed it. I admitted I was wrong too. So you are a liar when it comes to what you think has happened regarding me and other posters, even ones I've disagreed with in this very thread.

Secondly, if everyone is allowed to edit, why did you remove Sscalez's changes but kept Zuranthium's changes for a week while the wiki was locked?

[loramin]

You're right: you found a single (by far the most minimal example possible) of you admitting another poster is right about something.

But you're wrong (and stupid) if you take every word I ever write literally, or if you think one example negates the hundreds of counter examples.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Secondly, if everyone is allowed to edit, why did you remove Sscalez's changes but kept Zuranthium's changes for a week while the wiki was locked?

I didn't: I just froze the page for a week without picking any side.

Someone was on top when I froze it; they got to have the page there way ... a page that no one outside of this thread read, for just one week ... which did not hurt anyone in any way ... except it clearly hurt your feelings.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're right: you found a single (by far the most minimal example possible) of you admitting another poster is right about something.

But you're wrong (and stupid) if you think one example negates the hundreds of counter examples.

There are more examples, you just didn't read them, like everything else. You are a confirmed liar.

Why did you remove Sscalez changes while keeping Zur's if everyone can edit?

[loramin]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why did you remove Sscalez changes while keeping Zur's if everyone can edit?

You are literally making shit up now: the entire edit history is fully available:https://wiki.project1999.com/index.p...action=history

I didn't remove anyone's anything: I froze the page, for a week (and then after that week I removed the rankings).

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You are literally making shit up now: the entire edit history is fully available:https://wiki.project1999.com/index.p...action=history

I didn't remove anyone's anything: I froze the page, for a week.

Sscalez made changes after the wiki unlocked. You deleted them lol.

[loramin]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sscalez made changes after the wiki unlocked. You deleted them lol.

Ok, if we are talking after the lock, that's a different story. Stop shifting goalposts, it's not something honest people do.

After the lock there was no invititation to edit the page. In fact, to the contrary, I put a very clear warning in red at the top, saying don't mess with this page unless you're doing so to benefit the community.

Someone who edited the page ignored my warning. I put them on a timeout (as I did to you) and removed those edits.