Impeaching President Trump

[Horza]

Again, the odds of you ever even voting for a Democrat running for president against Trump are simply nonexistent. There is just no reason the DNC should care about what you think. Good luck in 2020, we both know that nobody is changing your mind.

[feniin]

Originally Posted by NegaStoat [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Okay, a more prominent outlet it is then

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/d...rimary-process

The facts remain the same, regardless of who states them. The court documents and statements aren't changing. You're right about the topic being one of Trump being impeached - I was merely pointing out that the party desiring this is just a sham of a party. Which will be even more of a sham of an impeachment now that Pelosi has called for a vote on the house floor.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/impeach...ws-conference/

The votes ain't gonna be there. Self interest is going to rule the day, especially in light of what judge Suillivan is finally ready to expose with the General Flynn case and who Page, Strzok, and McCabe answered to with the altering of the 302 that set the ball rolling for the case at all. 2020 is in the bag for Lord Emperor Cheeto.

Holy shit you really do live in an alternate reality. Did the Large Hadron Collider really destroy the fabric of the universe and merge it with another?

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by NegaStoat [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'll consider the DNC as a legit democratic party for electing a presidential candidate the moment they fix the following.

https://observer.com/2017/08/court-a...ainst-sanders/

https://www.wnd.com/2017/05/dnc-we-r...aries-so-what/

It's never changed. The democratic primaries are still a complete sham. It's a scam for money from fundraising, and that's all. The media buried the story for obvious reasons, and democratic voters are too flippin' dense to even understand nothing's changed. There are people that actually believe they have a chance to vote for Sanders, Cory Booker, Andrew Yang, or Tulsi Gabbard and that their vote will actually count for anything.

Originally Posted by NegaStoat [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Okay, a more prominent outlet it is then

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/d...rimary-process

The facts remain the same, regardless of who states them. The court documents and statements aren't changing. You're right about the topic being one of Trump being impeached - I was merely pointing out that the party desiring this is just a sham of a party. Which will be even more of a sham of an impeachment now that Pelosi has called for a vote on the house floor.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/impeach...ws-conference/

The votes ain't gonna be there. Self interest is going to rule the day, especially in light of what judge Suillivan is finally ready to expose with the General Flynn case and who Page, Strzok, and McCabe answered to with the altering of the 302 that set the ball rolling for the case at all. 2020 is in the bag for Lord Emperor Cheeto.

the only alternative is state-approved parties my dude. DNC did nothing wrong.

[Baler]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Baler]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Baler]

I'm bored
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Teppler]

My position on trump impeachment. I suspect the establishment which is made up of long term corrupt dems, Republicans and the intelligence community have Trump right where they want him. Not impeaching. Only on the verge of impeachment. Or on the verge of Mueller getting him. Or we are about to look into his taxes. Or whatever else is the scandal of the week they’ve drummed up.

What’s the purpose? Limit the scope of the executive branch. The president can’t fulfill an agenda to the best capacity if they are constantly being harassed with investigations.

Think about, relatively, who is empowered when the executive branch is limited? The exact people I mentioned. Congress, senate, fbi, cia , doj. They effectively lose one of the checks and balances over them when they hamper the executive branch.

That’s why these investigations will never have reasonable ends either way. In this way it’s kind of like brexit. People vote on something but the elites will never let it play out like the way the people wanted it. This is all really ugly stuff and has terrible treasonous implications.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by Teppler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My position on trump impeachment. I suspect the establishment which is made up of long term corrupt dems, Republicans and the intelligence community have Trump right where they want him. Not impeaching. Only on the verge of impeachment. Or on the verge of Mueller getting him. Or we are about to look into his taxes. Or whatever else is the scandal of the week they’ve drummed up.

What’s the purpose? Limit the scope of the executive branch. The president can’t fulfill an agenda to the best capacity if they are constantly being harassed with investigations.

Think about, relatively, who is empowered when the executive branch is limited? The exact people I mentioned. Congress, senate, fbi, cia , doj. They effectively lose one of the checks and balances over them when they hamper the executive branch.

That’s why these investigations will never have reasonable ends either way. In this way it’s kind of like brexit. People vote on something but the elites will never let it play out like the way the people wanted it. This is all really ugly stuff and has terrible treasonous implications.

#brand

[BallzDeep]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This thread is about the impeachment of President Trump, why are you telling us about your personal gripes with the DNC? It's not like you would ever even vote for a Democrat running for president against him, so I don't see why they should care what you think.



Other fine journalism from WorldNetDaily:

White girl: 'I'm tired of being looked at like prey.'

Black mobs plague nightclubs coast to coast.

Video: Is this a 'demon' racing in front of Obama?

Horza would rather argue about how Trump was booed at an MLB baseball game or posting memes that either party could grab and claim it applies. Maybe he is even dumber than he acts on the forums.

I wonder how many different people would have to tell him he's a loser before it's a majority here.

[Horza]

Originally Posted by BallzDeep [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Horza would rather argue about how Trump was booed at an MLB baseball game or posting memes that either party could grab and claim it applies.

What is there to argue about? Trump was booed by the crowd at the World Series, and I'm sure he won't make the mistake of appearing before people who aren't all hand-picked supporters again.