Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 11-07-2012, 09:41 PM
dredge dredge is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 577
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

right here guy:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-r..._b_914968.html
  #62  
Old 11-07-2012, 09:53 PM
Orruar Orruar is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dredge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
^ fine nitpick, not proven, but that argument is straight out of the Monsanto guide book of bullshit
If the Monsanto guide book says that we should use the scientific method to gain true knowledge, I'd say it's a pretty good book.
  #63  
Old 11-07-2012, 09:56 PM
Lexical Lexical is offline
Sarnak

Lexical's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: East Freeport
Posts: 398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If the Monsanto guide book says that we should use the scientific method to gain true knowledge, I'd say it's a pretty good book.
There is a problem with ethics though when they are applying the scientific method about potentially toxic intake to unknowing human participants which is actually considered illegal in the academic realm.
__________________
  #64  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:00 PM
Orruar Orruar is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexical [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
There is a problem with ethics though when they are applying the scientific method about potentially toxic intake to unknowing human participants which is actually considered illegal in the academic realm.
Right, but that's not what we're discussing.
  #65  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:03 PM
dredge dredge is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Right, but that's not what we're discussing.
Dude, read the article

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-r..._b_914968.html
  #66  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:03 PM
Lexical Lexical is offline
Sarnak

Lexical's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: East Freeport
Posts: 398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Right, but that's not what we're discussing.
lol yeah, I was about to correct myself actually. I didn't read the bottom posts of the page and just figured this topic was still on the health affects of food. My bad. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
  #67  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:04 PM
Lexical Lexical is offline
Sarnak

Lexical's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: East Freeport
Posts: 398
Default

GMO products** not food.
__________________
  #68  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:09 PM
dredge dredge is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexical [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
GMO products** not food.
hmm, so 95% of the groceries at the super market are not food?
  #69  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:09 PM
Reiker000 Reiker000 is offline
Kobold

Reiker000's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Jesus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Here you go Reiker.

A new paper reviewing data from 19 animal studies shows that consuming genetically modified (GM) corn or soybeans leads to significant organ disruptions in rats and mice, particularly in livers and kidneys. “Other organs may be affected too, such as the heart and spleen, or blood cells,” stated the paper. In fact some of the animals fed genetically modified organisms had altered body weights, which is “a very good predictor of side effects in various organs.”

Link to scientific journal: http://www.enveurope.com/content/23/1/10
I forgot that humans are the same as rats/mice.

Again, the biggest problem is that this proposition was an underhanded way for big business to route out small businesses. Everyone in support of 37 have been swindled exactly how they wanted you to be.

I'm not completely against the provisions of the proposition, but the thing was written terribly and really had nothing to do with "protecting people from GM food" like they were trying to lead people to believe. Fortunately, the majority were able to see through this.

Come up with a plan that doesn't completely cripple small retailers and try again.
__________________
<@patriot1776> i dont even rely on my facial hairs to get laid good luck to you
  #70  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:11 PM
Black Jesus Black Jesus is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Best Coast
Posts: 167
Default

When I go grocery shopping I walk up and down aisles without putting jack shit in the cart, and I'm not even looking to not eat GMO (well, there's no labels so how would you know?). I skip it because the American diet is high fructose corn syrup cholestoral processed ass bullshit.

So ya, 95% of groceries are not food.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.