Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

View Poll Results: Are you in favor of the proposed resist system changes
Yes 13 46.43%
No 15 53.57%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-12-2012, 01:49 AM
SamwiseBanned SamwiseBanned is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 828
Default

1. you voted yes to the proposed 2002 lucy changes, i assumed you voted yes because you were in favor of them.

2. that situation was different, I had a hasted/buffed pet and was completely out numbered. my game plan was to run around and divide you up while pet did some work. I dont think I used one nuke that whole battle because I was prepare to re-charm. more than half the battle i was just running around avoiding Nihilum casters until I was finally rooted at the spot in my SS. you never wanded my pet unless you did it after I died because it was still charmed as Northwest or some shammy killed me.

3. again you claim this and that but provide no proof other than 2 incomplete logs that fail to show level range and your MR. If you CAN roll with 171 mr then do so and root will no longer be a problem.

4. to be fair ive only attempted to root hughman when i was in my 30s/low 40s. i dunno I guess Tehruoh has some hacks because im not sure if hes ever been rooted.
  #2  
Old 09-12-2012, 01:54 AM
SamwiseBanned SamwiseBanned is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 828
Default

DESTIN: i think you might be confused on how balance for resists might be obtained. surely the availability of mr gear for the average player was considered. do you at least agree with that logic? or do you think the numbers were completely made up on the spot?

what factors do you think went into balancing the resist system 13 years ago?
  #3  
Old 09-12-2012, 02:05 AM
SamwiseBanned SamwiseBanned is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 828
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamwiseBanned [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
DESTIN: i think you might be confused on how balance for resists might be obtained. surely the availability of mr gear for the average player was considered. do you at least agree with that logic? or do you think the numbers were completely made up on the spot?

what factors do you think went into balancing the resist system 13 years ago?
since Destin is down for the count, I am asking all of you. What factors were considered when balancing pvp resists? If the knowledge and availability of resist gear was a factor, would you not think it would be different 13 years later when everything is written out on a wiki?
Last edited by SamwiseBanned; 09-12-2012 at 02:09 AM..
  #4  
Old 09-12-2012, 01:56 AM
SearyxTZ SearyxTZ is offline
Planar Protector

SearyxTZ's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,408
Default

Going back to lurking now. Godspeed + may your neckbeards shine brightly in norrath.

If I come back to this after GW2 gets stale I will roll a druid or wizzie and torment melees so I don't have to be the guy talking about classic resists.
  #5  
Old 09-12-2012, 02:15 AM
Dullah Dullah is offline
Planar Protector

Dullah's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,241
Default

Balance was EQ classic resists. It was fine. I enjoyed playing all classes.
__________________
  #6  
Old 09-12-2012, 02:16 AM
SamwiseBanned SamwiseBanned is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 828
Default

What made EQ classic resists balanced? again you fail to say anything relevant to the questions or points i brought up. Would you not think that the availability of resist gear (both knowledge of where to get the resist gear and the ability to camp it) for the average player played a part in determining the resists? Surely they didnt just come up with random numbers and it was good to go.
Last edited by SamwiseBanned; 09-12-2012 at 02:20 AM..
  #7  
Old 09-12-2012, 02:19 AM
Dullah Dullah is offline
Planar Protector

Dullah's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,241
Default

In my 1400 posts, no less than 200 of them have been about resists. Do a search.
__________________
  #8  
Old 09-12-2012, 02:26 AM
SamwiseBanned SamwiseBanned is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 828
Default

lol Destin can't think of a way to turn this around. probably asking Nizzar what to do. winning [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #9  
Old 09-12-2012, 02:46 AM
Dullah Dullah is offline
Planar Protector

Dullah's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,241
Default

You are bind rushing, with a pile of your corpses at your feet. Fortunately you can't delevel past 1.

I'm not going to be trolled by some cracked out dude with ADD who is too lazy to read what I've said for the last year. Just in the last few pages, Searyx has already reiterated what I've said in numerous posts.

Step away dude, you are just embarrassing yourself.
__________________
Last edited by Dullah; 09-12-2012 at 07:35 AM..
  #10  
Old 09-12-2012, 05:21 AM
Renk Renk is offline
Skeleton


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 19
Default

Unless I've missed something, so far it seems like Samwise is the only one to do any significant testing on this server and to consider how several actual pvp battles have gone here, rather than theory/old-memory/hyperbole.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.