Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 02-17-2012, 07:39 PM
Boombha Boombha is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
Wrong it was TMO's choice.
A - I am not in TMO

B - Are you saying that IB had no say in the rotation? or that IB choose not to argue for a VD rotation spot for the sake of their partnership and decided threw them to the wolves and make them contest every trak rather then have a cosy rotation spot? or that TMO calls all the shots and IB just goes along with it?
  #62  
Old 02-17-2012, 07:40 PM
Boombha Boombha is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 53
Default

*to throw
  #63  
Old 02-17-2012, 07:41 PM
Seaweedpimp Seaweedpimp is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,640
Default

Basicly ib does whatever tmo says needs to happen.



why? becuase they are #3
  #64  
Old 02-17-2012, 07:42 PM
IbVdzergFail IbVdzergFail is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 0
Default

Hows the inny loot been since epics came out bros.. oh wait you guys wouldnt really know now would you seeing as your 70 man squad wipes to hate trash every week while tmo kills him[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #65  
Old 02-17-2012, 07:55 PM
TMFail TMFail is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
IB had the choice to let them on their rotation slot or not. They told VD TMO wouldn't allow them in any rotation. Then told VD they should mess with TMO (we don't really care about that part)

We find it funny that VD believes IB and does all their dirty work while reaping none of the benefits.

It was easy. The rotation was TMO > IB/VD. IB said they wouldn't share with VD. TMO said VD couldn't have it's own slot cause they are partners with IB.

IB is the one that threw VD under the bus. Not TMO.

VD could, at any point, get on the rotation with their partner. All you have to do is ask ur partner.
TMO refused to have VD in the rotation calling them "weaklings" and that they would have to "fight for their spot".

That's exactly what they're doing competing on your traks.

You're just mad 'cause you got fucked sideways [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #66  
Old 02-17-2012, 08:03 PM
Autotune Autotune is offline
Planar Protector

Autotune's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Auburn, AL
Posts: 2,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TMFail [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
TMO refused to have VD in the rotation calling them "weaklings" and that they would have to "fight for their spot".

That's exactly what they're doing competing on your traks.

You're just mad 'cause you got fucked sideways [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
we refused their own spot, vd could very well partner up with ib on everything (rotations included) and be bound by the rules of the agreement.

They or IB choose to not let it happen, not TMO.

We haven't gotten fucked at all imo. VD is getting the worst end of the deal. IB has the most comfy position, TMO is still TMOing.

IB does little of the actual foot work, reaps all the rewards and then encourages VD to be good little pets and poke TMO as much as possible.

Why won't IB allow VD into their rotation for trak loot? seeing how they have to compete for their own now, would be nice for IB to throw them a bone. Or is IB still "not all about the loot" lol.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirken
I like to ninja edit people's Sigs.
  #67  
Old 02-17-2012, 08:04 PM
ivosik ivosik is offline
Orc


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 31
Default

from what i got from autotune was VD was allowed on the trak rotation but they had to share with ib every time. TMOfail seems crazy one sided and i dont really think what hes saying is true but who knows probably neither know nothing what they spew on here.
  #68  
Old 02-17-2012, 08:06 PM
TMFail TMFail is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
we refused their own spot, vd could very well partner up with ib on everything (rotations included) and be bound by the rules of the agreement.

They or IB choose to not let it happen, not TMO.

We haven't gotten fucked at all imo. VD is getting the worst end of the deal. IB has the most comfy position, TMO is still TMOing.

IB does little of the actual foot work, reaps all the rewards and then encourages VD to be good little pets and poke TMO as much as possible.

Why won't IB allow VD into their rotation for trak loot? seeing how they have to compete for their own now, would be nice for IB to throw them a bone. Or is IB still "not all about the loot" lol.
Lol, you guys can't help spitting on the alliance, you think IB reaps everything yet you fail to see loot is just split in too, items are on rotation, things just work perfectly in a perfect world !

You offer some competition too , it's fun and it's all good !

You just got fucked on this trak agreement 'cause your negotiation power is currently low. Maybe when TMO is back in shape you guys can get something better [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #69  
Old 02-17-2012, 08:09 PM
Boombha Boombha is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
Why won't IB allow VD into their rotation for trak loot? seeing how they have to compete for their own now, would be nice for IB to throw them a bone. Or is IB still "not all about the loot" lol.
To quote the talking points - "That's not what a partnership is all about"

It's sad, but I think some in VD actually believe that bs.

I'm curious how IB would respond if VD actually did contest one of their Traks, perhaps then, VD would realize they don't need to stand in IB's shadow's any longer, but that's not a risk IB is willing to take, so gotta keep up those talking points and push the party line.
  #70  
Old 02-17-2012, 08:12 PM
Seaweedpimp Seaweedpimp is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,640
Default

no eashit


y u mad
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.