Raid Petitions / GM CS

[Flunklesnarkin]

more spawns doesn't solve the problem of FTE


it just makes it occur more often.

[Flunklesnarkin]

one spawned one randomed could work


but that would just make it difficult for people to keep track of which is which


seems to add another layer of complexity on something that should probably be kept simple.

[Autotune]

no 2 guilds are going to sock a mob they know is going to spawn if there are 10 others about to pop as well.

A decision will be made and there will be no FTE battle. The high priority problem mobs will be killed first with no competition. the final mob/s will be low priority mobs that no guild will care about. /waves at gore

It solves problems.

This happens every single time.

[Flunklesnarkin]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

no 2 guilds are going to sock a mob they know is going to spawn if there are 10 others about to pop as well.

A decision will be made and there will be no FTE battle. The high priority problem mobs will be killed first with no competition. the final mob/s will be low priority mobs that no guild will care about. /waves at gore

It solves problems.

This happens every single time.

it solves problem on less desirable raid targets


still FTE spam fest on the most desired ones.

[Lazortag]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

no 2 guilds are going to sock a mob they know is going to spawn if there are 10 others about to pop as well.

A decision will be made and there will be no FTE battle. The high priority problem mobs will be killed first with no competition. the final mob/s will be low priority mobs that no guild will care about. /waves at gore

It solves problems.

This happens every single time.

I'd be interested in wondering what the experiences are of GM's who've had to deal with full repops, when they did happen (specifically whether there were less disputes). From the fights I took part in, FTE was never contested and there was much more emphasis on mobilization.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'd be interested in wondering what the experiences are of GM's who've had to deal with full repops, when they did happen (specifically whether there were less disputes). From the fights I took part in, FTE was never contested and there was much more emphasis on mobilization.

this is what happens. Instead of a race to tag each mob, it's a race of who can kill the most.

every time there are repops we avoid each other like the plague on high priority targets. Mainly cause it's a waste of time to bother with FTE bullshit.

Like I said, no guild will bother trying to FTE high priority mobs, there is more than 1. 5 total atm.

Who is going to go to hate to contest a mob against a guild already mobilized for it when Trak, CT, VS, Fay are still up?

No one.

Edit: There is not a single good reason for not implementing this.

[Silentone]

We need server repops, we need the FTE shout to be put in...hell if you can lock a target to a guild tag, do it.

[Szeth]

Originally Posted by Silentone [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We need server repops, we need the FTE shout to be put in...hell if you can lock a target to a guild tag, do it.

For a varied amount of max time per mob? Or is FTE on world dragons now an invitation to kite for as long as needed?

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Szeth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For a varied amount of max time per mob? Or is FTE on world dragons now an invitation to kite for as long as needed?

who cares, i want targets to say my name.

[Silentone]

Originally Posted by Szeth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For a varied amount of max time per mob? Or is FTE on world dragons now an invitation to kite for as long as needed?

By saying put the FTE shout in, I wasnt implying to throw out current rules and considerations.