Class Warnings for New Players

[Lune]

Originally Posted by Karanis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

OP reminds me of DSM a little bit, he may not type entire books but definitely has equally horrendous takes.

Just need to get them both in the same thread arguing with each other- BAM 200 pages of utter nonsense

[Karanis]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just need to get them both in the same thread arguing with each other- BAM 449 pages of utter nonsense

Fixed that for you [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Lampolo]

Its funny you mention DSM. Trying to argue that necros can heal as well as clerics for xp is very reminiscent of DSM trying to argue for the sake of Shamans. Listing technical vagrancies that mean nothing for what seems like an appeal to the naive is also a lot like DSM. So is shifting the goal post from best or most efficient to "can do"

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Lampolo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Trying to argue that necros can heal as well as clerics for xp is very reminiscent of DSM trying to argue for the sake of Shamans.

Nobody ever said necros heal as well as clerics lol. What was said was that a necro and bard can heal 95% of content - and they can. Between necro heal over time and the bard giving everyone an additional 50+ hp/tick … healing is trivial most places. For hardest content you will want a dedicated healer with “blast heal” potential for burst/danger. For those instances you will want any of the priests. Druids and Shamans fill this role just fine for 100% of group content. Clerics of course manage this role the easiest.

There really isn’t any group content needs a cleric …

I mean seriously we all know a 60 shaman can solo/duo about everything the group game has to offer.

[Toxigen]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There really isn’t any group content needs a cleric …

Gotta be careful here, Troxx my boy.

Need to define it as "XP group content."

There are a lot of targets that can be done in a single group that you definitely want CH for.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Gotta be careful here, Troxx my boy.

Need to define it as "XP group content."

There are a lot of targets that can be done in a single group that you definitely want CH for.

Yeah, I addressed that in an earlier reply. Guardian Wurms are a good example. Xp groups in Sirens Grotto or DN rats along with the deepest darkest corners of Seb are great examples.

But point taken. XP group content. Nobody hunts wurms for xp and for those hard camps where a Cheal is preferred are not places that people typically go for XP … at least not these days.

[Karanis]

Firstly, no one said necros or bards heal as good or better than clerics when a cleric's throughput is needed. Secondly, vagrancy: the state of living as a vagrant; homelessness.

[Karanis]

Clearly you're not very knowledgeable when it comes to EQ, so I'll go ahead and treat you like I treat DSM.

HUH.jpg

LOLE.jpg

[Lampolo]

Originally Posted by Karanis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

when a cleric's throughput is needed[/I]

A clerics throughput is usually needed for best xp

[Karanis]

Yes, yes. Go ahead and ignore your hilarious misuse of a word you've repeated 3-5 times so far even after being corrected twice DSM2.0.

WALL.jpg