![]() |
|
#61
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#62
|
|||
|
get well <3
__________________
pvp 2.0 pls
| ||
|
#63
|
|||
|
That’s your body telling you to stop being a redneck and give up cigs
__________________
God Bless Texas
Free Iran | ||
|
#64
|
|||||
|
Quote:
First, one of the supposed benefits of public discourse is to come to a general consensus about various issues. Which is kind of the basis of political parties- that they have collectively determined how to feel about the issues of today. And while it’s probably true that there are great ideas from most political parties, it’s a logical fallacy to assume a person has a “better” perspective on the issues if they sometimes go against the general consensus of their political party. This is called the “appeal to novelty” logical fallacy, and it’s something I always remember due to Jordan Peterson using this fallacy in his interview with some self-identified feminist. He suggested that she had worse ideas because she agreed with every other feminist about everything, which she then defensively denied. Second: Quote:
Now, group polarization. This is the concept within social psychology that explains how when a group of like-minded people come together, they actually come to hold more extreme beliefs as they discuss their beliefs with one another. It has been studied extensively, and itÂ’s a good thing to try to be aware of as youÂ’re interacting with like-minded individuals. It absolutely is something that happens in these online forums. And the fourth concept I want to touch on here is the concept of attitude polarization, which is a shift in attitude to more extreme beliefs due to confirmation bias. It has been shown that being subjected to opinions that go against our previously-held beliefs can sometimes just further entrench us in our opposition to these differing ideas, and attitude polarization can be a result of this. One mitigating factor can be the *quality* of discourse taking place; meaning something like academic standards being applied to the practice. Of course academics are just as susceptible to these social-psychological quirks of humanity, so there is no 100% sure way to avoid them. This is part of why participating in this sort of public discourse can be harmful, or at least push a person into holding extreme views. You may feel it is improving your vocabulary and keeping your mind active, and maybe it is. But thatÂ’s not all itÂ’s doing. A couple years ago I had a lot of fun talking fitness with you, but more recently IÂ’ve found that more than anything you are hateful. My own biases are ofc at play here, but I do think youÂ’ve radicalized yourself to some extent by talking politics so much in these online spaces. As so many of us have, maybe myself included. Thanks for making such a perfect post for me to consider <3
__________________
pvp 2.0 pls
| ||||
|
#65
|
|||
|
Just like all the others
| ||
|
#66
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#67
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#68
|
|||
|
cu real soon
| ||
|
#69
|
|||
|
YESSS! YYEEESSSS!
Y Y Y Y E E E E E E E EEEEEESSSSSSSS! | ||
|
#70
|
||||
|
Quote:
thx ) [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Apophis is closest to earth on 2029 April the 13th (a friday) lol
***this post is purely spiritual, speculative, apolitical and nonpartisan in nature. | |||
![]() |
|
|