Is there a God?

[solleks]

according to the solar model we have moved 3930000 million miles in 3000 years and the stars dimensions have not changed one single bit. the solar model is mans construct its not in the bible.

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by solleks [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

according to the solar model we have moved 3930000 million miles in 3000 years and the stars dimensions have not changed one single bit. the solar model is mans construct its not in the bible.

Again, why is my neighbors house still next door to mine?

[solleks]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Again, why is my neighbors house still next door to mine?

expand on this thought please, its not doing anything for me.

[Teppler]

Perhaps reality is an experience for God himself.

Jesus was said to be god in human form. A merging of the supreme divine energy with the mortality of being a human.

Before this it was said that God did not understand humans. He gave them rules and he was very vengeful when people broke them. Jesus asked his father to not punish the sinners, for they not know what they do. Jesus pleaded with his father not to punish people for making a mistake out of ignorance. That’s where the change between Old Testament and New Testament god took place. The New Testament god is much more forgiving. Jesus’s death was that sacrifice and through that it’s said god became aware of the struggles of being a mortal human. So it’s definitely a perspective that God is still learning and evolving and understanding this reality himself.

[pink grapefruit]

thou art god

[Deathrydar]

Originally Posted by pink grapefruit [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

thou art god

"Have I not stated that ye are all gods?"
Jesus Christ

[tsuchang]

In answer to op's question: Yes.

[Teppler]

The fact that we can’t just evolve into anything and I’m talking about over thousands of years, the speed which observable “evolution” actually happens, if you believe that, points to the idea of genetic engineering of some sort.

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Teppler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The fact that we can’t just evolve into anything and I’m talking about over thousands of years, the speed which observable “evolution” actually happens, if you believe that, points to the idea of genetic engineering of some sort.

Thousands of years is practically nothing in evolutionary timescales, but I agree a reptilian, gene-splicing Jesus seems the more likely answer.

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by Teppler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The fact that we can’t just evolve into anything and I’m talking about over thousands of years, the speed which observable “evolution” actually happens, if you believe that, points to the idea of genetic engineering of some sort.

I think the interesting thing is that, in theory, it should be much easier for a modern human's descendants evolve into 'fish' than a modern fish's descendants evolve into a 'human'.

Generally, when animals evolve, they won't lose all their genes used by their previous form. The function of those genes will either be altered, or they simply won't be expressed (the genes are turned off).

In other words, a human should still contain much of the programming to produce a fish, where as a fish would have very little programming to make a human; only things from archaic systems that a human inherited from his fish ancestors.