2 and 1/5 Month Raid Ban

[Cecily]

If anything things have gotten worse since I stoped logging in.

[aaezil]

Ouch ella way out of touch whats happened

[Ella`Ella]

Originally Posted by aaezil [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ouch ella way out of touch whats happened

Life, sadly.

[Baler]

Core is some former AW and another group right?

So you want me to feel sorry for a group of people who have been rabble rousing p99 for years? gtfo

[REMEZ]

And I quote

"Be careful what you do with Core. They are going to get popped, its just a matter of time, and if youre there when they fuck up, your getting popped too"

[Baler]

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=132299

You are responsible for the people you let onto your account. Disciplinary action may be enacted upon your account even if you yourself were not responsible for any rule breaking. Do not share account info if you are not ready to deal with the consequences of someone else's actions.

[Erati]

Disciplinary action may be enacted upon your account even if you yourself were not responsible for any rule breaking.

Does not infer larger guild wide punishments for rules broken on borrowed accounts and from what we have seen in the past are all done case by case basis. ( see Hyjal v Aftermath v Vulak )

[Tupakk]

Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Disciplinary action may be enacted upon your account even if you yourself were not responsible for any rule breaking.

Does not infer larger guild wide punishments for rules broken on borrowed accounts and from what we have seen in the past are all done case by case basis. ( see Hyjal v Aftermath v Vulak )

Everything is case by case. With feelings clearly attached.

Assimilate or get fucked.

[Baler]

Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Disciplinary action may be enacted upon your account even if you yourself were not responsible for any rule breaking.

Does not infer larger guild wide punishments for rules broken on borrowed accounts and from what we have seen in the past are all done case by case basis. ( see Hyjal v Aftermath v Vulak )

If you are in a guild on that account you are subject to raid/guild server rules with that account. Regardless of who is playing on it.
This is true and can be proven due to the fact that people can't raid under a different guild tag while on a raid suspension. It's attached to you, your account and the guild you are in on that account.

It's YOUR responsibility not to let this happen. Don't boohoo and try to point at tempest for your lack of account security.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Erati]

Originally Posted by Baler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's YOUR responsibility not to let this happen. Don't boohoo and try to point at tempest for your lack of account security.

No boo-hoo ing here Tempest did nothing wrong that triggered Core's extension, they were simply playing Everquest.

I was just pointing out that its the account holders responsibility to eat punishments for rules broken on their accounts not a group that is unknowingly associated with ced rule breaking as its been handled in the past. My example of Hyjal v AM v Vulak was a situation where Hyjal logged in an AM account to train AM during a Vulak attempt and after proving the facts he was individually suspended and AW was not held responsible for the train.

Case by case - do you know what this means? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]