![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
legit pop was lower then 36 players last few months of classic.
same shit will happen in long run good luck god bless | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
"What played armor piece?"
__________________
![]() | ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
Wipe + simpler or less Play Nice rules + Team-play + Leaderboard + unban past non-hacker accounts.
I'd go for that, or two or three of them. Wipe. To decrease the top-heaviness and twinked chars. This is always temporary benefit, but in PvP MMO's helpful. Hands-off rules. Too many Play Nice rules kills open world PvP, plain and simple. It's not compatible with classic-era Everquest. Team-play. Creates a safer harbor for leveling players. Good for roleplaying. Encourages new people to play on Red. Leaderboard. Can indirectly encourage Play Nice. Keeps people killing for leaderboard position. Gives big picture. Unban non-hacker accounts. Too many people are banned for being di***. This happens with too many rules and corrupt GM's. I've always tolerated griefers. I never liked them. Maybe that explains my feelings about Play Nice rules. But honestly, reading the LootnScoot rules just made me vomit. The spirit is good, but it's overcooked.
__________________
Full-Time noob. Wipes your windows, joins your groups.
Raiding: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...&postcount=109 P1999 Class Popularity Chart: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...7&postcount=48 P1999 PvP Statistics: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...9&postcount=59 "Global chat is to conversation what pok books are to travel, but without sufficient population it doesn't matter." | ||
|
Last edited by stormlord; 10-29-2017 at 11:36 PM..
|
|
||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Everyone is playing on zek
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
Feasty stranglers***
I mean to say. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
I've got 5 people ready to come play after the wipe!
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
having fun actually on red, missing pvp tho
__________________
____
Sssarn Fantasy | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|