Aftermath suspeneded... discuss

[bktroost]

Originally Posted by khanable [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

nemce what the fuck

you just said both guilds conceded so you were going to move in

cucs, i was not even online at the time. Our guys said double tracker FTE, looks like both are conceding. So we got people online and started the move and then i get a message saying "uhh aftermath FTEd it. They are killing it looks like." So we called it off.

[khanable]

nemce, I like you, but you're making it real fuckin hard to armchair GM this

[bktroost]

Originally Posted by khanable [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

nemce, I like you, but you're making it real fuckin hard to armchair GM this

hahaha well i hear they need some new ones on their staff! You been around a long time, how about you turn in that ST Rod for a ban hammer? Braknar tells me ban hammers look real good on Iksars.

[Skew]

Full Definition of frivolous
1
a : of little weight or importance
b : having no sound basis (as in fact or law) <a frivolous lawsuit>
2
a : lacking in seriousness
b : marked by unbecoming levity



If Katierakel was tracking and zoned out without getting YT then zoned back in and ran up to get YT , this would be a frivolous petition.
The zoning out is crucial. There is nothing stopping a tracker zoning out / in and becoming an FTEr at any point in a mobs window even without any concession and regardless of other guilds competing.

If this is the case shouldn't a frivolous petition be punished more severely than an honest mistake as you make the GMs look foolish. 20 day ban inc? Or is it 30 as Awakened already had a 10 dayer.
Crikey.

[khanable]

i'd rather die than mediate angry virgins

[Raev]

It's also an interesting question: if one guild's tracker trains another, are both DQed due to multiple FTE messages?

If so, deals can be arranged . . . .

[Tankdan]

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's also an interesting question: if one guild's tracker trains another, are both DQed due to multiple FTE messages?

Thats been done a lot especially in kunark. It doesnt DQ the one who got trained.

[bktroost]

off to watch netflix. enjoy the very little insight i brought. mazel tov.

[khanable]

Originally Posted by bktroost [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

enjoy the very little insight i brought

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

<3

[Ella`Ella]

Someone asked about spirit of the rule versus the literal rule - as the author of this rule, the rule was created to eliminate Autofire abuse. If a tracker zones out, zones back in, runs up and then secures FTE uncontested (meaning no one ran against them before, during, or after they began running up) this wouldn't violate the spirit of the rule.