Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-04-2015, 02:59 PM
KagatobLuvsAnimu KagatobLuvsAnimu is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Gensokyo
Posts: 1,709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
thats not true nirg not at all.

hes going after anyone making 250k a year or more, if you dont know that then you just are thinking with your hip and not your brain, pal.

Unless of course by going after the 60k a year you mean, hes going after a way to lock in your retirement and make sure you have better health care and quality of life with employers not to mention, more employment for that salary range.
Citation needed.
  #2  
Old 11-04-2015, 03:07 PM
iruinedyourday iruinedyourday is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,348
Default

prob too many words for you, or you think forbes is some biassed libtard forum who knows how your mind works

http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjre...e-sanders-win/
  #3  
Old 11-04-2015, 04:38 PM
KagatobLuvsAnimu KagatobLuvsAnimu is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Gensokyo
Posts: 1,709
Default

The 250k figure is talking about social security benefits not taxation. According to Forbes. I also love the...
Quote:
The document talks about closing loopholes but doesn't get specific.
  #4  
Old 11-04-2015, 05:25 PM
Orruar Orruar is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The 250k figure is talking about social security benefits not taxation. According to Forbes. I also love the...
Often when they say "close loopholes", they mean remove deductions that people making as little at $40k a year are likely to take. Republicans do this too. And if anyone says they're for balanced budgets, but don't specify what government spending they're willing to cut, then they're talking out of their ass. There's no way we could tax enough to cover current levels of spending.
  #5  
Old 11-04-2015, 06:02 PM
iruinedyourday iruinedyourday is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Often when they say "close loopholes", they mean remove deductions that people making as little at $40k a year are likely to take.
can you give me a single example that would make you say this?

And please even if you can find a single example, since were talking about the democratic party here, make it an example where a democratic instituted a change like this.
  #6  
Old 11-04-2015, 06:26 PM
Pokesan Pokesan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,957
Default

what's the benefit/usefulness of a balanced budget
  #7  
Old 11-04-2015, 06:40 PM
KagatobLuvsAnimu KagatobLuvsAnimu is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Gensokyo
Posts: 1,709
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
what's the benefit/usefulness of a balanced budget
It makes a candidate sound like they give a fuck and theoretically gets them votes.
  #8  
Old 11-04-2015, 07:09 PM
Orruar Orruar is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
what's the benefit/usefulness of a balanced budget
Is this a serious question? Assuming it is, I'll treat this like explaining it to a child, because I can't picture a grown adult asking something so obvious.

Every time the government spends more money than it collects in taxes for the year, it has to borrow money from someone to make up the difference. When you borrow money from someone, they charge you a fee for the time that you have the money. We call this fee "interest". Currently the US government spends over $200B a year on interest. That's $200B we don't have for other things like roads, health care, education, and bombing brown people. And that's a lot of money Timmy!
  #9  
Old 11-04-2015, 08:39 PM
Pokesan Pokesan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,957
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Is this a serious question? Assuming it is, I'll treat this like explaining it to a child, because I can't picture a grown adult asking something so obvious.

Every time the government spends more money than it collects in taxes for the year, it has to borrow money from someone to make up the difference. When you borrow money from someone, they charge you a fee for the time that you have the money. We call this fee "interest". Currently the US government spends over $200B a year on interest. That's $200B we don't have for other things like roads, health care, education, and bombing brown people. And that's a lot of money Timmy!
I'm quite aware of what interest is, please provide an actual explanation instead of jerking yourself off about how dumb I am - everyone already knows that.
  #10  
Old 11-04-2015, 10:31 PM
Orruar Orruar is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm quite aware of what interest is, please provide an actual explanation instead of jerking yourself off about how dumb I am - everyone already knows that.
Paying $200B a year in interest isn't enough of an explanation for why running neverending deficits is a bad plan? I don't understand what you're missing here.

Let's put it in personal finance terms. Would you go out and throw $100k worth of vacations on a credit card, and then just pay $20k in interest per year in perpetuity without ever paying off the debt? It's all about standard of living. Sure your standard of living was great during the $100k hookers and blow cruise through the Caribbean, but your standard of living is reduced until you pay off the debt.

Because of the profligate spending of previous generations, we're now having to waste $200B a year on interest rather than using it for useful things like roads, schools, and medical care. And this is during a time of historically low interest rates. The interest payments are only going to get more onerous as interest rates rise.

Edit: China
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.