![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
|
Last edited by Samoht; 04-08-2015 at 01:05 PM..
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Erydan 54 bard // Nizzam 36 necro // Liako 31 pally
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
I understand you could cleric Rez some clerics then some mana batteries. But EVERY wipe, if you have a raid force of 50 players, Rezzing all of them costs 50*700*0.9=31500 Mana. Without buffs that's 1575 Med ticks. Over 2.5 hours of medding. That can be split by multiple clerics on the raid, and that can be accelerated with enchanters, bards and Necromancers. But that is still a huge amount of unnecessary downtime. Cleric epics give you more attempts per night and more clears completed instead of being called halfway through because they get people up faster with no mana burned. Bard epic is good. It's addition to singing equates to 56 extra resist for an entire group. That's like adding a Tranix Crown, Earring of Essence, and 2 Jacinth Rings worth of resists to everyone in the group. Just because of that bard epic. So it will save you mana in-fights from healing and increase DPS because people live longer. Also some people mentioned it earlier - No bard mana songs are modifiable. The cantata modifies the HP given, the mana however cannot be increased. If it's bugged on this server and is getting modified, I will endeavor to Nerf this with all my power, because that is not classic. But in the long run, a cleric epic will save more time and end up getting you more loot. If only one class epic were allowed to resist. From a raider and grouper standpoint, cleric epic would be winner hands down.
__________________
| |||
|
Last edited by Daldaen; 04-08-2015 at 01:19 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
The level 32 mana song is modified by the voice modifier on the epic, though. In luclin, bards get Amplification at level 30, which is a self-buff that increases singing and works with that song. They also get Voice of the Serpent, which is a range clicky item that gives Resonance, a +singing buff. It drops from a named in Ssra [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Cantata of soothing is a string-based song and only the hp regen gets modified by having a lute equipped. That's not a bug, because if the mana regen component was able to be modified, it would be absurdly overpowered.
__________________
Erydan 54 bard // Nizzam 36 necro // Liako 31 pally
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Maybe that's a question of poor itemization. Some epics are better than others. Some are bad. Any given epic for a specific class is the best epic that class will get.
This debate is silly. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
I wasn't trying to win a debate...its just chatting. So edgy p
You're right that itemization in future expansions (unfairly) cut the life or usefullness of the certain epics out early...but the fact is that bards were still holding on to their epics years after most classes had put them into bags or bank slots. Top gear PoP bards, when you picture them, are still holding that singing short sword (until PoP drop from inny)...so you associate the item with bards more because they had it for much longer than most classes in their hands. Also, the bard epic happens to just look very very cool =P As for my love of the wizard epic, I already said that I'm very partial because I played a wiz on live and that was my first epic ever. First love, etc. | ||
|
Last edited by fastboy21; 04-08-2015 at 12:08 PM..
|
|
||
|
#8
|
|||
|
I'm not saying you are. Just other people aren't agreeing with my bias towards rogue epic, which is the best epic, and therefore thread is wrong and silly.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Except a few other minor things (like picklock or CRs), rogues only do one thing and have a single purpose. Damage. Their epic have the most impact because it directly increases the damage they do, which, coincidentally, is pretty much the only thing they're doing. Other classes have workarounds and other skills/spells, meaning their epic won't create a strong impact like it does for rogues. Which leads to me disagreeing with most people in this thread gushing about the bard epic, when in reality, while it's nice... It's definitely not *that* amazing. The most common argument is the singing mod. It's true that it's the only item in the game that modifies singing. But does it really matter? In the grand scheme of things, not really, no. So what does increased singing modifier gives to a bard. Well, it gives you slightly better resists and DS from psalms, a better single-target snare/AC/AGI debuff with the level 51 song and a bit more mana per cast with the level 32 song. Haste and slow values on songs are never modified, whether from the voice modifier on the epic or by any instruments. Is it good? Yep, no doubt. Game-changing? Not even close. The epic proc is surely very nice. 55% haste is better than what you can provide with songs, albeit still under what a chanter will give to melee in a raid setting. So unless you're in a melee-heavy group without a chanter, the proc basically becomes a +30STR/ATK for the melee group. Is it nice? Yes, of course. Does it give you whiter teeth and a bigger penis? Nope. The epic also gives bard the luxury to not switch instruments during combat, or to play certain songs that require an instrument. You also give slightly better stats from songs that have stats associated to them due to the all-around 18 mod given by the epic, while you melee. Is it desirable? Of course. Is it worth selling your wife and child for it? I don't think so. Now, when i read things like: Quote:
Sure, you get some nice bonuses and an awesome proc (if there's no enchanter around), but that's it. Being able to give +40 MR or 10 more points on a damage shield isn't game-changing in any way whatsoever. At the very best, you will be able to pump more mana in the longer velious fights in the caster group, which might be noticeable to them after puretone fades. The raving comments in this thread about the bard epic leads me to think that people are affected by the sunken cost fallacy, which makes you believe something is better because you have invested a lot in it. I had my epic during PoP, i raided and grouped with it. It is certainly nice and if someone magically offered me a bard epic MQ for free, i'd absolutely take it. But "fundamentally changes the way the class operates as a whole". Not even close.
__________________
Erydan 54 bard // Nizzam 36 necro // Liako 31 pally
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#10
|
|||
|
1. Bard - no other epic is as class changing or offers as much diversity as the bard epic moving bards from mana batteries to front line fighters
2. Cleric - streamlines one of the class defining features and makes it manaless 3. Rogue - high backstabs, check, haste, check, AP buff, check 4. Ranger - like a rogue, without backstabs 5. Magician - revolutionary pet, but pets are only a percentage of what mages do considering nukes, rods, and coth 6. Warrior - one of the best taunt procs in game OR one of the best 2h DPS weapons in game. neat gimmick. 7. Paladin - taunt proc isn't class defining, but it's good. have stuns from other sources. 8. Monk - magic fists that you can click for haste when no other haste is available. that's cool. 9. Druid - a dot click for soloing with a snare component 10. Shaman - a dot click for soloing with no snare 11. Enchanter - they have the opposite problem of the cleric. haste is nice, but VoG has better stats and WR is faster. the spell also has stacking problems, but you will still cast it a lot on raids 12. Wizard - the mana regen and shield are nice, but are both kind of insignificant in combat 13. ShadowKnight - probably most useful for its 2h bash, but then only really benefits races without slam 14. Necromancer - it's a free snare/dot, but they already get snare/dots and it does not stack with root | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|