Recharging on Red99

[krazyGlue]

I vote. No

[Littlegyno 13.0]

this is an amazing troll by slathar.

he pretends that people are going to use the already rare lockets of escape to mass bind raids in order to bind rush?

really slathar bravo.

back to the issue: red deserves recharging at the exact same price/method as blue. we can't recharge lockets for mischief binds, we can't recharge mallets for PVE encounters.

If rogean decides to make golem wands not rechargeable, thats fine, BECAUSE THEY STILL FUCKING DROP.

[Slathar]

Originally Posted by Littlegyno 13.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

this is an amazing troll by slathar.

he pretends that people are going to use the already rare lockets of escape to mass bind raids in order to bind rush?

really slathar bravo.

back to the issue: red deserves recharging at the exact same price/method as blue. we can't recharge lockets for mischief binds, we can't recharge mallets for PVE encounters.

If rogean decides to make golem wands not rechargeable, thats fine, BECAUSE THEY STILL FUCKING DROP.

This is not a troll. I am addressing an issue that would break the server in every aspect; PvE and PvP.

You say that Golem Metal Wands shouldn't be rechargeable because they still drop. This means that you feel because you didn't have the time, ability, or forward planning to camp Lockets of Escape that a special exception should be made for people who don't have one so they may bind in Plane of Mischief. This is the definition of bias.

Item recharging will throw this server back into the era of instant death, plummet the population into double digits, and serve only the self-centered players who didn't take initiative to camp Lockets of Escape in advance.

[Littlegyno 13.0]

Originally Posted by Slathar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is not a troll. I am addressing an issue that would break the server in every aspect; PvE and PvP.

You say that Golem Metal Wands shouldn't be rechargeable because they still drop. This means that you feel because you didn't have the time, ability, or forward planning to camp Lockets of Escape that a special exception should be made for people who don't have one so they may bind in Plane of Mischief. This is the definition of bias.

Item recharging will throw this server back into the era of instant death, plummet the population into double digits, and serve only the self-centered players who didn't take initiative to camp Lockets of Escape in advance.

I'm in favor of full classic, rechargeable golem wands, PVP clickable trak teeth etc. I'm willing to support a compromise as several people have complained that they don't want clickies involved in PVP.

How exactly will allowing mallets and lockets to be recharged result in a era of instant death?

[krazyGlue]

Yes your guild will . I vote fuck no .

[Littlegyno 13.0]

Originally Posted by krazyGlue [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes your guild will . I vote fuck no .

i mean, do you have any evidence of us using lockets or binding melees to bind rush before or are you just talking out your ass?

forum posts? logs? screenshots? fraps?

[Slathar]

Originally Posted by Littlegyno 13.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i mean, do you have any evidence of us using lockets or binding melees to bind rush before or are you just talking out your ass?

forum posts? logs? screenshots? fraps?

There was no precedent of guilds using Trakanon's Tooth on a regular basis on Live PvP servers, but yet it still got removed. People here have the benefit of 16 years of Everquest knowledge. Of course people will use the Locket of Escape in nefarious ways to trivialize difficult PvE encounters and PvP encounters. Next question, please.

[Littlegyno 13.0]

Originally Posted by Slathar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There was no precedent of guilds using Trakanon's Tooth on a regular basis on Live PvP servers, but yet it still got removed. People here have the benefit of 16 years of Everquest knowledge. Of course people will use the Locket of Escape in nefarious ways to trivialize difficult PvE encounters and PvP encounters. Next question, please.

Basically what you're saying is that people were stupid on live so therefore these things shouldn't be allowed to an emulator 15 years later.

How will lockets trivialize content? You can bind in Kael already and Skyshrine, that was your argument previously?

[Slathar]

Originally Posted by Littlegyno 13.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Basically what you're saying is that people were stupid on live so therefore these things shouldn't be allowed to an emulator 15 years later.

How will lockets trivialize content? You can bind in Kael already and Skyshrine, that was your argument previously?

Kael and Skyshrine are only two zones. There are an uncountable number of situations where an army of melee binding at the same spot would trivialize content and PvP encounters.

Let me reiterate, item recharging on Red99 will absolutely destroy the integrity of PvP in every way possible.

[krazyGlue]

Originally Posted by Littlegyno 13.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i mean, do you have any evidence of us using lockets or binding melees to bind rush before or are you just talking out your ass?

forum posts? logs? screenshots? fraps?

You bind rushed us in fear . Causing a massive train / Suicide leading to a raid suspension . What's stoping you from doing this again ?