Lets play beastlords and Berserkers in classic!

[Puyen]

You make an excellent point. I too would like to see book med back though. Just my opinion

[Retan]

Originally Posted by Puyen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You make an excellent point. I too would like to see book med back though. Just my opinion

Every minute spent medding with the book open, Cazic Thule kills a kitten.
Its true, I read it on wikipedia or some other credible source.

[Savard18]

Originally Posted by Puyen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You make an excellent point. I too would like to see book med back though. Just my opinion

Having a 100% classic server is good idea in theory, but improving on things that were dumb, or not bothering with them is 10x better.

Book med is dumb.

[HippoNipple]

Whats the point of book med without open pvp? I thought that was always the only reason for it and the rest of the servers just suffered for no reason.

[Ishio]

I want this to happen, yet at the same time I'm more than satisfied with it not happening. I'm one who loves to solo, and yes there are other classes I can solo with, yet Beastlord has always appealed to me.

It's probably because of the Monk/Shaman combo, maybe the fact that it has a sweet pet, or maybe even because I love monk's, so the DW, H2H/1HB weapon combo pulls me in.

It's probably the fact that I love the name BeastLord.

I say, add them in, if the server ever hit Luclin, but not before. Keep the progression, if that's what P99 is doing, and don't defer from it.

[Noselacri]

This is a pointless discussion. They're not going to even consider doing it, so it's no use trying to convince them.

[Bodeanicus]

Originally Posted by Kassel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thank you for attacking me with the logic and flare of a teenage girl on her first period. I am a hypocrite for not asking devs to fix something they have stated is technically impossible to do on an emulator based on titanium code? I have been here for one month and apparently you joined in Nov 2009 yet you still do not have the faintest clue how the server works nor what the devs are trying to achieve here. Sure the faction issue is not perfect and could use an update. But how does coding a beastlord help you fix the faction bugs? it doesn't. It makes it more likely that the faction issues will not be fixed. Wasting devs time complaining about something outside the "vision" of this server is as i stated idiotic. And FYI the spellbook change happened during the Classic trilogy period. Beastlords did not.

I was addressing your "get the fuck out, this is CLASSIC" attitude, when it's obviously not a "classic" server. It wasn't called for. You didn't like it when addressed in the same manner, judging from your "my pussy hurts" response. I know this is the internet, where there are rarely any repercussions for being a prick, but try to show some fucking manners. Oh, and chief? You don't own the server, do don't act like someone jokingly suggesting Beastlords and Beserkers being added is a personal insult.

And by the way, the Spellbook was still in effect during Kunark.

[Kassel]

A few bugs based on server code do not make this a "non classic" server....

I love the guy telling me to go F myself demanding I show some maners, then calling me a “chief” and hypocrit…only on the interweb…Thanks for pointing out that the book was removed in Kunark, LIKE I SAID IN MY POST, it was removed at some point during the Classic trilogy. Which is Vanilla, Kunark and Vellious. The devs have been very clear (read the FAQ) Luclin will not be added. So why waste their time asking stupid questions.

[Savard18]

Originally Posted by Bodeanicus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And by the way, the Spellbook was still in effect during Kunark.

The spellbook was an annoyance and overall it is not a big deal it was left out.

Anyone who complains about it, or says something like item linking doesn't make this classic is just being 100% anal.

They are doing this server the right way.

[Bodeanicus]

Originally Posted by Savard18 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The spellbook was an annoyance and overall it is not a big deal it was left out.

Anyone who complains about it, or says something like item linking doesn't make this classic is just being 100% anal.

They are doing this server the right way.

I agree. But why bitch about one, and not the others, just because it's convenient? And then attack anyone who questions it. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy.