I love white girls.

[Bodeanicus]

Originally Posted by Harrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Translation:

Bodeanicus: "WAAAAAAAAAAH poor hippie bullshit about rich people and how bad he has it being their fault, and their fault alone. WAAAAAAAAAH Please get me a tampon my pussy is bleeding all over my legs!"

What's the matter? Run out of Ultimate Fighting footage to jerk off to? Rambo not give you wood any more? Can't find a fellow "vet" to share long showers and massages with. Here's something for you in the meantime, sweetcheeks.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/09/0...iers-kept.html

[Abacab niggah]

Originally Posted by Bodeanicus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're a fucking idiot. First of all, it wasn't fucking acceptable at all to the people who were enslaved. And secondly, he wouldn't have owned any slaves, and you wouldn't either, as they were obscenely expensive. And lastly, not every single African slave was sold into slavery. There was an entire industry that revolved around slave "catching." So you take take Klan bullshit you're spouting and stick it up your troll ass.

You know what used to acceptable that wish would come back? Cutting the heads off the filthy rich when they grind their foot on the necks of the poor just a little too much. It always changes things. Sometimes for the best, sometimes for the worse. Witness the French Revolution, the American Revolution, and the Bolshevik Revolution. A couple of dead billionaires would get the point across.

In all regards empires were built from slaves, from the banks of the nile to the gold paved roads of Rome. The point I'm getting at is the slaves of Africa were not hunted and gathered by European powers but rather forced into slavery by the conquering Muslim empires that stretch back all the way to the early 14th century.

There was no need to "hunt and catch" when the port cities under foreign control were subjugated into an expansive, colonist empire to which people that shifted sovereignty over to these powers incensed themselves to be enslaved on all social strata.

Regardless what you think but in the earlier parts of human history you had a choice, become enslaved by the empire who destroyed your culture, or become completely written out of history books, it was much easier to swallow working for your enemy and retaining some shred of your cultures preservation, than to be piled thousands high in some unmarked grave.

[AexDestroy]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

mmm white girls.

[Dukat]

Originally Posted by AexDestroy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

mmm white girls.

Hm. Just when I thought this thread couldn't get any worse.

This should help.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Bodeanicus]

Originally Posted by Abacab *****h [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In all regards empires were built from slaves, from the banks of the nile to the gold paved roads of Rome. The point I'm getting at is the slaves of Africa were not hunted and gathered by European powers but rather forced into slavery by the conquering Muslim empires that stretch back all the way to the early 14th century.

There was no need to "hunt and catch" when the port cities under foreign control were subjugated into an expansive, colonist empire to which people that shifted sovereignty over to these powers incensed themselves to be enslaved on all social strata.

Regardless what you think but in the earlier parts of human history you had a choice, become enslaved by the empire who destroyed your culture, or become completely written out of history books, it was much easier to swallow working for your enemy and retaining some shred of your cultures preservation, than to be piled thousands high in some unmarked grave.

"The majority of European conquests, raids and enslavements occurred toward the end or after the transatlantic slave trade. One exception to this is the conquest of Ndongo in current day Angola where Ndongo's slaves, warriors, free citizens and even nobility were taken into slavery by the Portuguese conquerors after the fall of the state."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_slave_trade

While the majority were sold in to slavery, don't try to pretend they all were. And don't pretend it was a voluntary indentured servitude situation, either.

[Tiggles]

Originally Posted by Taxi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My ancestors were actually slavers. Theres an island in Africa that bears my name. But thats beyond the point, the fact is that even during those times, there was people that did find slavery abhorrent, it was the slave themselves, and people like Bartelomeo de Las Casas.

The most ridiculous part of your statement is that "Most people felt that human slavery was indeed acceptable". That was the people on top, the slavers. For example If a majority of Haitians thought that slavery was indeed acceptable in the 1790s then they wouldnt have led the first successful slave revolt culminating in the independence of a country.

The native americans who drowned themselves at sea when given the choice of being slaves or dying didnt "indeed think that slavery was acceptable".

Taxi's Last name is Madagascar.

Also I would never touch a white girl who fucked a black guy.

[Harrison]

Congratulations, hippie, you can google!

All of what you just said, if anything, supports the point I made originally; "White people aren't the only ones to blame."

[Japan]

Originally Posted by Tiggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also I would never touch a white girl who fucked a black guy.

[Abacab niggah]

Originally Posted by Bodeanicus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"The majority of European conquests, raids and enslavements occurred toward the end or after the transatlantic slave trade. One exception to this is the conquest of Ndongo in current day Angola where Ndongo's slaves, warriors, free citizens and even nobility were taken into slavery by the Portuguese conquerors after the fall of the state."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_slave_trade

While the majority were sold in to slavery, don't try to pretend they all were. And don't pretend it was a voluntary indentured servitude situation, either.

No, it was expansionist policy.

Slave trading goes on today with 12 year old from Russia getting sold for sexual exploitation and the majority of those cases aren't from kidnappings, but by their own families selling them into it.

By default not every slave in history was sold by it community, but a fair share of them were and due to expansionist policy of European and Islamic nations during those times it became quite lucrative to sell people for cheap labor because empires and palaces needed building.

It wasn't until the death of colonialism/expansionism that the slave trade fell off, because there was no longer a need to sail 4,000 miles away and subjugate people via power and military might, things became more diplomatic and the exploitation of people as slaves fell of in favor of installing governments that were pro-nation in order to thinly veil the dominating cultures intentions (Exploitation of capital resource).

Essentially you let a nation keep their sovereignty instead of ceding them as it allows a screen of smoke for easier exploitation.

[Abacab niggah]

Originally Posted by Tiggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Taxi's Last name is Madagascar.

Also I would never touch a white girl who fucked a black guy.

I wouldn't care if she fucked a black dude...

But if she fucked a black dude in order to piss off daddy or fling the act as a badge of honor to "stick it to ____" in some sort of arrogant and self-inclusive way. I totally wouldn't cause bitch is probably riddled with self esteem and father issues that would manifest and surface later in life in the form of homicide.