![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Does the staff care about Red99 still? | |||
| Yes |
|
37 | 37.00% |
| No |
|
63 | 63.00% |
| Voters: 100. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#61
|
|||
|
Talking like that will endear you to this community well done.
Not trolling. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#62
|
||||
|
Quote:
Putting equations in excel. Looking to see if its a little broke or a lot broke. H
__________________
Haynar <Millennial Snowflake Utopia>
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#63
|
||||
|
Quote:
H
__________________
Haynar <Millennial Snowflake Utopia>
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#64
|
|||
|
Resist curve a tough one. Is the goal to make it classic or make it good?
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#65
|
|||
|
The goal is to make it better.
I can see what they were trying to do. But some cases like when a nuke has a stun component, its getting a double bonus to land. The special spells should not get extra bonuses, that are cummulative. Looks like part of the problem. H
__________________
Haynar <Millennial Snowflake Utopia>
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#66
|
|||
|
It would actually be nice if they were separated...like you can resist the stun portion but still take damage.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#67
|
|||
|
Haynar keepin' it real
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#68
|
|||
|
I remember people saying that spells with multiple effects of different types would suffer multiple resist checks making the entire spell more likely to resist outright.
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic> Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue | ||
|
|
|||
|
#69
|
|||
|
Thats how its supposed to be. Spells that dmg/stun dot/push etc were easier to resist.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#70
|
|||
|
A double resist check should make the spell harder to resist when it has two components to it.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|