Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-19-2009, 05:50 AM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Planar Protector

Hasbinbad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,067
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Hey there, Thought i'd drop in my 2 cents.. [bunch of stuff unrelated to the topic] ..reward the true old school players.
This looks like a great post for a different topic. I'm not trying to be a jerk, it actually sounds like a fun idea, and I think you should make another topic about it. I would definitely post ideas.
__________________
  #2  
Old 12-19-2009, 05:42 AM
Ektar Ektar is offline
Planar Protector

Ektar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Old World
Posts: 1,188
Default

And as for your post andman, the major problem is that the GMs do not want to be involved. And actually in response to this I just thought of a problem with my previous post's idea... get to that ina second... But yeah, GMs do not want to be involved, and even more turning this into an event for everyone on the server is just adding things unnecessarily to what this is trying to accomplish. It's like throw pillows on a bed. (and honestly, I just find that to be incredibly boring, and I'd feel like a kindergartener. Not to deter bringing ideas, I just feel like this particular one's not gonna fly.)


So yeah my previous post's idea... will allow for buff cheating, cuz there won't be thorough dispel cleansing before the allowance of self buffs. I can't think of a solution to that off the top of my head, other than allowing any buffs, but that's not a good idea at all heh. Perhaps it needs to be thrown out. If you like the idea please try to save it!
Last edited by Ektar; 12-19-2009 at 05:49 AM.. Reason: cuz
  #3  
Old 12-19-2009, 05:54 AM
Andman Andman is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 11
Default

Already theres lots of arguing about dueling, trivia just seems simpler and less problematic.. with same potential results
  #4  
Old 12-19-2009, 05:55 AM
Ektar Ektar is offline
Planar Protector

Ektar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Old World
Posts: 1,188
Default

Yes, but so is /random 100. See above for argument against this
  #5  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:00 AM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Planar Protector

Hasbinbad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,067
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Already theres lots of arguing about dueling, trivia just seems simpler and less problematic.. with same potential results
Here, have this instead.
__________________
  #6  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:01 AM
Andman Andman is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 11
Default

and upon the start of the battle, people in the battle rush forward and everyone else scatter back. The battle will therefore depend more on leadership and quick thinking, rather than foreplanning of "kill soandso first, soandso second, and soandso third."

this is riddled with problems.. wouldnt work
  #7  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:02 AM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Planar Protector

Hasbinbad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,067
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
and upon the start of the battle, people in the battle rush forward and everyone else scatter back. The battle will therefore depend more on leadership and quick thinking, rather than foreplanning of "kill soandso first, soandso second, and soandso third."

this is riddled with problems.. wouldnt work
Goobles?
__________________
  #8  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:02 AM
Ektar Ektar is offline
Planar Protector

Ektar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Old World
Posts: 1,188
Default

AND as for a solution to my own problem! Cut down the numbers on each side so it's like 1 to 1 real contender to decoy... like 3v3 fight will start with 6 people on each side, 3 in battle, 3 that'll run back. Each side sends other people over to mass dispel, and then watches as they buff up to make sure they only get self buffs. But once again I run into the same problem of the decoys buffing the real contenders.. sigh! I need to go to sleep =p. Perhaps the decoys can only be non buffers or weaker buffers. Like warriors can be there, paladins if a cleric is there, rangers if a druid is there (or cleric if a cleric is there, paladin if a paladin is there, etc). So the decoys can't actually aid in buffing. And during the fight, everyone not involved can be like "okay if they were actually in the fight and these were the decoys, is it possible for those mofos the CHEAT?! DID THEY!?" and if it's shown that cheating did happen (or was possible due to an error) that side loses. I'll even go so far as to look into everyone's spells, but I feel like there are enough non-casting classes to make this simple enough (and I know for a fact that so far in the timeline paladins are weak clerics, and can add no advantage... I assume same for rangers n sks.)
  #9  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:07 AM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Planar Protector

Hasbinbad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,067
Default

Ektar made me think of something Allizia said..

If it's a 2v2, guild A comes to the fight with 3 players, guild b eliminates one.
If it's a 3v3, guild A comes to the fight with 5 players, guild b eliminates two.
etc.

?
__________________
  #10  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:03 AM
Ektar Ektar is offline
Planar Protector

Ektar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Old World
Posts: 1,188
Default

I like how we're all here just chattin =p. I JUST said there are problems with it, andman - look a few posts up


GOIN TO BED CHECK BACK LATERZ
Last edited by Ektar; 12-19-2009 at 06:07 AM..
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:03 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.