Changing PVP level range? and other

[Etorryn]

Another change that will make the server more blue and wont attract many more people. Never had a problem 1-60 leveling (solo, not knowing anyone and not guilding until 54 as a monk), actually enjoyed hitting 52 knowing it was open game. The people that complain and quit the server probably wouldn't of stuck regardless. Instead I think the changes will hurt the current player base while trying to attract more people to a 15 year old game. I will not come back to 2v1 against oor healers and bards with a low population. Wont be shit to do if I can't pvp except once a week. I could barely find legit pvp before all the changes and don't see people rushing back to make up for the lack of range. Elderan will need to crunch some numbers to prove it.

[mccallawazzle]

aye glad we're all agreed then: this completely unsolicited, divisive proposition hadnt even been an issue until the staff decided, on a whim, to 180 on the server rules yet again.

Of the 3 active level 52s on the server, one of them at least appreciates being able to join his friends and battle at the high end, instead of waiting til 56 just to be able to participate.

levelling sucks id prefer to fight even a losing battle. pretty sure +/- 4 is what theyre running over on Hidden Forest already anyway.

[vouss]

Damn Drakaris Is so dumb

[Kergan]

Every sustainable population has a significant transient group of people in it. We don't need every person to come to R99 and play for 3 years for the server to be better.

[Rushmore]

Originally Posted by runlvlzero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

rushmore got owned so f'ckn hard i feel bad for him

I'm assuming your talking about the reaction to my post? On the contrary! Top guilds are NoSing people before big fights. Everyone is a Skelly before a battle begins. All it takes is someone winning a big raid battle due to 55 OOR heals. Better yet .....Your main is 60 put a OOR healer on same account. Once you die log in the healer ...etc....Possibilities are endless. I prophesied here before an I'm doing it again. I get it all aren't 60. I'm currently 57. Off and On I've played on a EQ EMU server for almost 7-8 yrs NOW!? Dam. This isn't rocket science a lot of these ideas have been tried before and failed. Aka ITEM LOOT.

This is a problem. I don't understand why the community that still plays here isn't crying more about this horrible change that will just make less PVP or PVP less enjoyable.

This is HardQuest not WOW bullshit! I don't play anymore. Won't play till Velious might not play till then. I get my PVP fix in League anyhow.

Whatev.. I love how the DEVS or GMS here have all these grand ideas on this server and get excited about the slightest change that does nothing but make things worse. Instead of listening to what the people here mostly want. Just better EXP.

No one is whining about dying on a pvp server! If so they exited a long time ago they aren't coming back.

[SamwiseRed]

we would have had them if it wasnt for that pesky meddling 55 cleric!

-said noone ever

[Rushmore]

ok.... no tactics to be exploited. Not just heals.... a range of things. Gonna be so awesome when a grp of 60's camping an item gets to hang out with a 55 rogue or whatever and can do nothing about it.

Oh wait let me log on my 59 to deal with this. Ok.... Yall get what you want!

[SamwiseRed]

id rather an idiot log in a 55 cleric than another 60 main honestly + ive never seen a large scale battle with only 60s involved. i can assure i for one will never be 60.

[SamwiseRed]

with that flawed logic why arent people logging in 51 clerics in mass pvp. oh wait because thats fuckin stupid lol

[Kergan]

But a 55 cleric can cast like two maybe even THREE more spells.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]