The Ultimate Truth

[HippoNipple]

Originally Posted by Hateraid [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Really? For a guy? Maybe for weaklings like you and hippo. Maybe if you weren't so dumb and read better, you would know I was directing that comment to hippo since those are his measurements.

Now as for a woman, we are also saying 5"10 165 lbs isn't usually bad for a woman. Quick recap for someone so enraged he can't comprehend anything... Always seem to have to dumb shit down for you.

165 lbs for a woman is chubby. You are trying to make yourself feel better by writing over and over that 165 lbs is good but the only girls you can get are still big. Nothing changing bro.

If you think 165 lbs is too skinny for a guy that is 5'10" you are either completely delusional, bad with numbers, or drinking that hateraid. I'm not saying 165 isn't the norm for girls that size in America but they aren't hot. If a girl is in awesome shape with good curves she will be in the 130's MAX. I live in Dallas and there are a lot of good looking girls around that have that "impossible model body" you speak of.

Either way the conversation is retarded. Most women are going to be in the 165 lb range if they are 5'10", but most women aren't smokin hot. Someone has to bang the average chicks, and obviously that is you. I have always had success getting the girls I'm attracted to, go me.

[Azure]

*posting pre-transition pics kinda dumb, but hey IDGAF, you all wont show yourselves. Prob cause fat and mad.

[Azure]

Originally Posted by HippoNipple [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

165 lbs for a woman is chubby. You are trying to make yourself feel better by writing over and over that 165 lbs is good but the only girls you can get are still big. Nothing changing bro.

If you think 165 lbs is too skinny for a guy that is 5'10" you are either completely delusional, bad with numbers, or drinking that hateraid. I'm not saying 165 isn't the norm for girls that size in America but they aren't hot. If a girl is in awesome shape with good curves she will be in the 130's MAX. I live in Dallas and there are a lot of good looking girls around that have that "impossible model body" you speak of.

Either way the conversation is retarded. Most women are going to be in the 165 lb range if they are 5'10", but most women aren't smokin hot. Someone has to bang the average chicks, and obviously that is you. I have always had success getting the girls I'm attracted to, go me.

Dood your on crack... photoshop barbie is 140 and 5'10''

There are a TON of pretty athletic girls that don't have their ribcage showing. 5'10" is taller and 165 is more athletic than I was 10 years ago. That is not an ugly chick. Your mind is wrapped in some kind of mass media delusional image of beuty. Fixated on weight alone.

[Azure]

Upon further research.... your prob hippo is you relate muscle and BMI to weight.

A woman at 165 with an athletic BMI is fucking sexy. You are dating fat flabby chicks???? Not attracted to fit people?

[Azure]

I cant envision a dood with a healthy BMI at 165 and 5'10'' it doesn't compute and i have an epic brain for this shit.

Aushwitz

[Azure]

Or pure fat... and omg if your pure fat at 165-5'10'' god help you...

[Azure]

Looks healthy 2 me... even though not athletic BMI's

Hippo tripin and hatin proven.

[Tassador]

Give me dem Latinas ass. tits could always be upgraded.

[phacemeltar]

Originally Posted by Hateraid [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No one cares.

you just mad because i pointed out that there are opinions that differ from yours, thereby deflating your argument and validating your homosexuality. rainbows r cool!

[Sektor]

Originally Posted by phacemeltar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you just mad because i pointed out that there are opinions that differ from yours, thereby deflating your argument and validating your homosexuality. rainbows r cool!

lmao