FE/IB Kills 3 CT's in a row watch TMO's snipe attempt

[HeallunRumblebelly]

Originally Posted by Funkutron5000 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also, if another guild grabs FTE with no obvious attempt to engage on their FTE message while another guild is running in to engage, is that raid interference as well?

Fastest jav in the west precedent indicates that is not the case.

[Yapas]

LOL you can now leave this thread hitpoint !

[Hitpoint]

I assume there are logs which show someone in our raid pulling CT away? Or where is the video? This is the first I'm hearing of this.

[Derubael]

Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I assume there are logs which show someone in our raid pulling CT away? Or where is the video? This is the first I'm hearing of this.

Encounter log + fraps you guys provided.

100% for sure was not a member of TMO.

In response to funk's question, yes, if you pull aggro on a mob someone else's guild has engaged, you must do everything you can to drop that aggro immediately. This means die/zone (if you are right next to a zone line), gate/pot/cap out or FD.

If someone engages a mob they aren't ready for, they will wipe. If they stall the mob so they don't wipe, fraps and petition.

[Prismaticshop]

Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Encounter log + fraps you guys provided.

100% for sure was not a member of TMO.

In response to funk's question, yes, if you pull aggro on a mob someone else's guild has engaged, you must do everything you can to drop that aggro immediately. This means die/zone (if you are right next to a zone line), gate/pot/cap out or FD.

If someone engages a mob they aren't ready for, they will wipe. If they stall the mob so they don't wipe, fraps and petition.

Since Imba from FE/IB got the first FTE, then TMO, FE/IB disengaged, why didn't TMO engage, because CT got trained away ?

On the second engage, FE/IB has FTE, CT is trained away as well yet they engaged it nonetheless and killed it.

Same thing happened for both guilds, the GMs call is retarded.

Not that I'm really blaming you guys, it really is a shit show to manage so I guess at some point you guys need to put someone in the penalty box. But FE/IB did kill CT on their FTE, with their raid force.

[Yapas]

Originally Posted by Prismaticshop [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Since Imba from FE/IB got the first FTE, then TMO, FE/IB disengaged, why didn't TMO engage, because CT got trained away ?

On the second engage, FE/IB has FTE, CT is trained away as well yet they engaged it nonetheless and killed it.

Same thing happened for both guilds, the GMs call is retarded.

Not that I'm really blaming you guys, it really is a shit show to manage so I guess at some point you guys need to put someone in the penalty box. But FE/IB did kill CT on their FTE, with their raid force.

You was at fear ? guess not. Shinko didn't have the fte

[Prismaticshop]

Originally Posted by Yapas [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You was at fear ? guess not. Shinko didn't have the fte

The first video clearly shows Imba gets FTE, then someone in TMO does, hence the disengage. that's facts.

[Derubael]

Originally Posted by Prismaticshop [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Since Imba from FE/IB got the first FTE, then TMO, FE/IB disengaged, why didn't TMO engage, because CT got trained away ?

On the second engage, FE/IB has FTE, CT is trained away as well yet they engaged it nonetheless and killed it.

Your logic is flawed. FE/IB trained their own engage away from their force during the second engage.

In the first engage, FE/IB trained TMO's engage away from their force.

Do you see the difference?

I'm stepping out of this thread, was just here to clarify the facts. Please don't call our decisions bad when you obviously don't understand them in the first place.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by kotton05 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

SPINNING

Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your logic is flawed. FE/IB trained their own engage away from their force during the second engage.

In the first engage, FE/IB trained TMO's engage away from their force.

Do you see the difference?

I'm stepping out of this thread, was just here to clarify the facts. Please don't call our decisions bad when you obviously don't understand them in the first place.

Merkk getting owned by Deru [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Keep spinning merkk.

[AenarieFenninRo]

Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In the first engage, FE/IB trained TMO's engage away from their force.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]


Tasslehof, are you going to now step up and live up to your convictions and demand that Imba be suspended for a month?