Heres your proof Sloan

[doraf]

Originally Posted by doraf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This thread is poop.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ele]

Add the fact that the alleged breach was only raised after Sericx was killed.

[Daldolma]

there was no disqualification. sericx continued to perform the terms of the contract with no reference to disqualification, effectively waiving any cause of action he might have had regarding breach. upon losing, he raised the issue of disqualification which had been immaterial for 30 minutes. this counterclaim fails 10 times out of 10.

if anything, the fact that he raised this issue after his death provides further evidence that he knew sloan still believed the competition to be in effect. his failure to attempt to collect his winnings after the supposed disqualification occurred further undermines his position

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

there was no disqualification. sericx continued to perform the terms of the contract with no reference to disqualification, effectively waiving any cause of action he might have had regarding breach. upon losing, he raised the issue of disqualification which had been immaterial for 30 minutes. this counterclaim fails 10 times out of 10.

if anything, the fact that he raised this issue after his death provides further evidence that he knew sloan still believed the competition to be in effect. his failure to attempt to collect his winnings after the supposed disqualification occurred further undermines his position

Where was the time limit stated for raising an issue? Bad lawyer is bad.

A competition in VP is always in affect the competition for money would be known to be over upon initial death or disqualifcation.

Anecdotes are fun tho!

[Ele]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Where was the time limit stated for raising an issue?

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Please show me where this contract states that Sericx has to immediately terminate a bet?

Ball.. court... go

There doesn't have to be a time limit for waiver. It is an issue for the finder of fact to determine. The question is whether 30 minutes of continued PVP/training without Sericx announcing the breach before he died without killing the other person constitutes waiver. I would argue that it is a case of waiver. Sericx hasn't denied that he continued to fight without terminating the bet. Sericx had the opportunity to immediately end the PVP and collect any alleged winnings, then continue unrelated train activities for his pleasure. However, he did none of those things. Only once he died did he make a claim of winning by the other side being disqualified for something that occurred 30 minutes earlier.

Bad lawyer is bad.

No need to bring ad hominem into this. As you said yourself:

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yet another logical fallacy. Seems you share a common fault with a few others here.

A competition in VP is always in affect (sic) the competition for money would be known to be over upon initial death or disqualifcation.

You are now injecting assumptions. Is it your position that the bet ended as soon as the fear wurm was set off by someone other than Sericx/Xerses, and that all PVP/training that went on for the next 30 minutes was just normal VP activities?

Anecdotes are fun tho!

You can argue against waiver all day long, but most of know the reason you are taking the position that you are.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Ele [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You are now injecting assumptions. Is it your position that the bet ended as soon as the fear wurm was set off by someone other than Sericx/Xerses, and that all PVP/training that went on for the next 30 minutes was just normal VP activities?


You can argue against waiver all day long, but most of know the reason you are taking the position that you are.

These 2 statements right next to each other are kind of laughable, contradictory and logical fallacy.

I'd hope you could do better.

As to your first statement in the quote... Yes that is the position because that is what the contract states. There wasn't any notice of continuing after first death or Disqualification.

[Alarti0001]

Ahh quote got left out but it was in reference to my position

[Ele]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

These 2 statements right next to each other are kind of laughable, contradictory and logical fallacy.

I'd hope you could do better.

As to your first statement in the quote... Yes that is the position because that is what the contract states. There wasn't any notice of continuing after first death or Disqualification.

We will have to agree to disagree and let the jury of RNF cast judgment upon Sericx.

WTB mod to add a poll: Who should receive the 100k winning? A. Sericx B. Xerxes/Sloan.

[Godefroi]

the fact is Sloan murdered Sericx in 1v.1 , thats the only interesting part in this, the rest is just a pasty nerdy n a fat asiat raging and spinning [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Funkutron5000]

Originally Posted by Godefroi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the fact is Sloan murdered Sericx in 1v.1 , thats the only interesting part in this, the rest is just a pasty nerdy n a fat asiat raging and spinning [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Stops spreading lies, Visceral. Always trying to spin, spin, spin. It was Xerxes that did the murdering of Sericx, not Sloan!