PSA: ATTN - If you are bound in raid zones, read this

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

LOL. really man?

so by your logic, its technically not an exploit until someone makes the staff aware of it? logic so incredibly flawed

Amelinda was well aware of it. It has been FOURTEEN months with ZERO comment on the issue, and even at the time of the debate of changes to red, not once was there a proposal of retroactive change to peoples binds. NO ONE, not a single person, EVER took the stance that retroactive removal of binds was appropriate or would be enforced, over the course of a two month debate of changes to Red, and not one post or comment was made by a GM on the issue, including ones such as Amelinda who witnessed it. To now call it an "exploit" seems pretty ludicrous to me given these facts. I have ZERO issue with now going forward instituting this rule, I just take issue with it being called an "exploit", and it seems to be in line with everything else on this server, rules made up and changed on the whim with zero idea for the players what is an exploit what is not what is legal what is not.

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by p-niner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

HB lawyering beats himself. Oil Baron XantILLE would be embarrassed to be lumped in with you as a member of the same alumni.

Says make all dragon zones no bind, then explains how perma and solb are unbindablr becausr considered FFA zones.

Not... sure... if... srs.

Where did I ever say that? I illustrated how the logic contradicts itself. You have custom FFA rules for Sol B and Perma and based upon the logic for said rules it should extend to KC as well, but it does not. I apologize that this mind blowing logic went over your head.

[hagard]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How is it an "exploit" if there was never a written or even verbal rule against it?

God dam how did u make it thru college???

[Nirgon]

No my reason is you should do what Sirken tells you to do and stop thinking you actually are in charge here.

It's obviously not classic, I'm not here, I give 0 fucks but show Sirken some respect.

[Nirgon]

You know what else it doesn't say in writing in the rules? Don't be a dumb ass.

So how can you be a dumb ass acting like a dumb ass if there's nothing saying don't act like a dumb ass.

[karsten]

guys my whole schooling and career has been specifically designed to make me an expert on this and other issues related to the everquest universe

[Nirgon]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think Heartbrand could bring a lot to Dumass and Dumass.

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No my reason is you should do what Sirken tells you to do and stop thinking you actually are in charge here.

It's obviously not classic, I'm not here, I give 0 fucks but show Sirken some respect.

Questioning rules is basically the quintessential trait of liberty.

As to Hagard, there's a huge difference between exploiting pathing or money dupes or something that doesn't have a rule written about it but is clearly wrong, with something like this, retaining your bind post change following a vigorous two month debate during which not once was it suggested retroactive bind removal should be applied.

[p-niner]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Where did I ever say that? I illustrated how the logic contradicts itself. You have custom FFA rules for Sol B and Perma and based upon the logic for said rules it should extend to KC as well, but it does not. I apologize that this mind blowing logic went over your head.

Kc a FFA zone?

[SamwiseRed]

was gonna put my 2 copper but sirken pretty much forumbombed nizzarr and hb through 3 tables from the top rope.