The Destruction of Straightness

[Rhambuk]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I just want to point out the fact that someone wasn't "born" a certain way, really has nothing to do with whether there is a choice involved with their behavior at a later date. The role of genetics in human behavior is just a small part of a much bigger issue about Free Will.
Considering modern neuroscience has shown that we make decisions before we even think about them; it seems completely unjustified to get behind this magical free will concept where everyone has complete control over all (most, or even any) of the choices they make in life.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...ding-free-will

I honestly don't believe its a choice. Humans, down to you and I, can't consciously choose what we find attractive. I can't stop and think to myself, that 350lb chick with the lazy eye crazy hair misshaped boobs flat ass lisp broken teeth and horrible body order is hot. No matter how hard I try i won't be able to convince myself thats hot, if it is to you thats great fat ugly chicks need love to but its not for me.

In saying such I don't believe no matter how hard I try I could choose to be a true homosexual. I can choose to physically have sex with a man that doesn't mean im attracted to him or the idea, it just means that i have control over my physical self.

[Rhambuk]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

they totally chose to sin.

you need to send them to doggy straight camp lest they burn in doggy hell for all eternity.

[visage]

If someone is born gay. Does that mean they are born with a disability?

[visage]

If you are a male and you were blind folded. Another male performed Oral sex on you. Do you think it would feel terrible if you enjoy it with a female?

[Rhambuk]

Originally Posted by visage [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you are a male and you were blind folded. Another male performed Oral sex on you. [I]Do you think it would feel terrible if you enjoy it with a female?]/I]

huh

Its not like the male mouth is different from the female mouth, gloryhole surprise? =p

[visage]

Exactly. I want to make the point of you can enjoy sexual acts with anything and anyone. Yet still have a sexual preference to one sex. We can label it Bisexual, Pansexual , and situational. The fact remains, the majority of society will band and deem one as innapropriate , more so than the others. The gay movement is filled with society's stereotypes on purpose. Eventually society will be desensatized to it and accept it. Until society decides to get over it... Expect lots of things the majority finds odd. With that being said.... I wonder whats next on the list... Perhaps sexual preference on animals or machines???

[Rhambuk]

Originally Posted by visage [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Exactly. I want to make the point of you can enjoy sexual acts with anything and anyone. Yet still have a sexual preference to one sex. We can label it Bisexual, Pansexual , and situational. The fact remains, the majority of society will band and deem one as innapropriate , more so than the others. The gay movement is filled with society's stereotypes on purpose. Eventually society will be desensatized to it and accept it. Until society decides to get over it... Expect lots of things the majority finds odd. With that being said.... I wonder whats next on the list... Perhaps sexual preference on animals or machines???

ok ok all sounds good.

whats next? I don't know, the homosexuality movement i can get behind humans should be able to do whatever they want as long as all parties are 100% consentual. I'm a firm believer of Jack Kevorkian's work as well.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Haha wiki, ty for agreeing with me (kinda). "Living organisms that do not attempt to follow or do not succeed in satisfying these imperatives are described as maladaptive; those that do are adaptive."

Gay people are therefore maladaptive and that's why society hates them. Science!

Riiiiight.

Humans are no longer subject to biological imperatives.

The fact that you think we are says a lot about you.

[visage]

Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ok ok all sounds good.

whats next? I don't know, the homosexuality movement i can get behind humans should be able to do whatever they want as long as all parties are 100% consentual. I'm a firm believer of Jack Kevorkian's work as well.

Right on. Now as soon as science finds a way to communicate with animals more clearly. I believe we humans might be able to have mutual consentual sex with some animals one day. Machines.... Another story... Although with computers now in days and biology. We probably can just breed our own consentual beings to our liking , and or even animals or machines. If not a false state of reality , if we aren't currently living in one... Now just need to que the music for White Zombies - More human than human

[Rhambuk]

I'm not really a big supporter/fan/advocate of beastiality and honestly I don't want to see people making out with their dogs in movie theaters. as for machines, drill a hole in the side of your tower and stick your fleshlight into it, dim the lights to set the mood hmmmm romance.