Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Ripqozko]

He literally will post after everything because he needs the last word to “win”. This will keep
Going.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Here is Troxx's data for reference. It is using his own standards of being in a group for an extended period of time. He is doing... 79 DPS (without damage shield). That is exactly what I calculated in the math. It is the precise number. He is using an average of 2 nukes per encounter, which is why his DPS is 40. His pet DPS is lower than the individual parses he showed earlier because there is DPS time lost when controlling the pet. This just means his group was pulling slower, because he can average 2 nukes per encounter, and he said he was never out of mana. This group mathematically isn't killing one mob every 36 seconds without pause. If you are landing 4 Shocks of steel per minute, you are spending 1100 mana per minute, while only regaining 210 mana. This is assuming you have C2 and are meditating 5 ticks per minute. You need to be standing for at least 24 seconds since each cast is 6 seconds. From his individual parses his group is not killing everything in 20 seconds or less. The average time was 36 seconds. Killing the mobs in 20 seconds or less on average would be the only way he could get 40 DPS per kill on a single nuke, but he hasn't provided kill speed data for this group.

He is going to try and claim the parser is wrong and is undervaluing his data. If that's the case, why should we trust any of his data, or GamParse to begin with? He is going to try and claim the Monk's DPS is lower (which is correct since they are pulling), but what he fails to understand is HE IS THE ONE DOING THE PARSING. He is going to get all of his own data (pet and nuke data), because he is always in camp lol. He is assuming that if the Monk's DPS is lower, his must be too. It's not logically the same. He is just sitting in camp, doing his best DPS job he can, and he is getting all of this own logs since he is parsing. He isn't pulling or doing anything else.

The truth is GamParse is working fine, but Troxx is in denial. This is really sad and embarrassing. Now since this is just an image, it could be photoshopped. But I doubt it, since it gives out the data he is claiming is incorrect.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=638 - Here is real objective data for DPS comparisons between a Mage and a Shaman, using a level 49 Sebilis Mob. A Shaman can do 55.2 DPS, a Mage can do 82.7 with damage shield. The difference is only 27.5 DPS. This is a level 60 Mage vs. a level 60 Shaman, no clickies or mana buffs, and assuming the group is killing a mob every 36 seconds.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"Silly troll posting"

Wow. Sorry you are so mad lol. You can choose to believe that is what happened in the thread you linked[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Sorry you don't got Warder loot, silly.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wow. Sorry you are so mad lol. You can choose to believe that is what happened in the thread you linked[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Sorry you don't got Warder loot, silly.

Your multiple apologies are accepted alongside your silent concessions, both prior and pending. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your multiple apologies are accepted alongside your silent concessions, both prior and pending. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Still mad. Still bad. Still sad. No Warder loot either. Essence Lens is great though, and better than most Warder loot. So you will be fine.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Still mad. Still bad. Still sad. No Warder loot either. Essence Lens is great though, and better than most Warder loot. So you will be fine.

You do not know who I am, neither in-game nor IRL, you do not know what loot I have and you do not know how I feel. You may choose to type whatever you wish, it does not change those facts. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You do not know who I am, neither in-game nor IRL, and you do not know how I feel. You may choose to type whatever you wish, it does not change that fact. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you don't care, then why bother posting false nonsense?

Clearly you are still mad from that other thread (which is 4 months old at this point), which is why you are bringing it up lol.

Seriously it is ok. Essence Lens is better than most of the Warder loot you would have gotten. Only the most dedicated of raiders are getting SoM or Fungi Robe, and that is honestly only a few people. None of the other loot really matters. You could argue gnome mask if you are a fashion fanatic, but that is besides the point.

EDIT: I am not going to be responding to any more posts about this silly nonsense involving the other thread with you cyxthryth. Either you are attempting to troll (poorly), or you have some weird grudge and felt the need to bring up a 4 month old thread that isn't even related to this one. Not a good look either way. Please stick to RnF if you want to make a thread about it[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Here is Troxx's data for reference. It is using his own standards of being in a group for an extended period of time. He is doing... 79 DPS.

Quote my entire post or not at all. I told you it gets buggy compiling lots of fights and everyone’s dps was artificially reduced by about 30%. I was doing 79dps no more than Grandmaster (15/18 tunare fist and 15/20 sleepers fist) was doing 48dps.

Do not quote me out of context.

You are grasping at straws and literally flailing at this point.

(Well figuratively flailing. We all know you’re a concrete thinker so I guess the obvious should be specified)

[DeathsSilkyMist]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Here is Troxx's data for reference. It is using his own standards of being in a group for an extended period of time. He is doing... 79 DPS (without damage shield). It is the precise number I calculated. His DPS is 40 simply because he is nuking more per encounter, but math-wise this also means they aren't pulling mobs that fast. His previous encounter data shows an average kill speed of 36 seconds, and he has yet to provide average kill speed for this data set.

There are two ways you can interpret this data:

1. You can believe Troxx, who is claiming his DPS parser is undervaluing the data by 30%. If that is true, then honestly all of the data he has posted so far is meaningless because his parser is wrong, and he needs to get a better parser.

2. GamParse did it's job and parsed Troxx's DPS correctly. The reason why he thinks the data is undervalued by 30% is because his similarly equipped Monk can do 70 DPS when he isn't pulling. That is where he is getting the 30% number, 70 x 0.7 = 49. The flaw in Troxx's logic is the Monk is only losing 30% DPS because he is pulling, NOT because the parser is wrong. Troxx isn't pulling, he is just sitting in camp DPSing and parsing. He is not losing any DPS, so there is no 30% loss for him. He is basically falsely assuming that if the Monk loses 30% DPS, everybody else is losing 30% DPS too. The parser is correct, and Troxx is wrong.

Either way, he basically has nothing to back up his silly points. The burden of proof now lies on him to either provide better data, or prove his parser is undervaluing all DPS by 30%, and not just the Monk who is pulling lol.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=638 - Here is real objective data for DPS comparisons between a Mage and a Shaman, using a level 49 Sebilis Mob. A Shaman can do 55.2 DPS, a Mage can do 82.7 with damage shield. The difference is only 27.5 DPS. This is a level 60 Mage vs. a level 60 Shaman, no clickies or mana buffs, and assuming the group is killing a mob every 36 seconds.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Here is Troxx's data for reference. It is using his own standards of being in a group for an extended period of time. He is doing... 79 DPS (without damage shield). It is the precise number I calculated.

There are two ways you can interpret this data:

1. You can believe Troxx, who is claiming his DPS parser is undervaluing the data by 30%. If that is true, then honestly all of the data he has posted so far is meaningless because his parser is wrong, and he needs to get a better parser.

2. GamParse did it's job and parsed Troxx's DPS correctly. The reason why he thinks the data is undervalued by 30% is because his similarly equipped Monk can do 70 DPS when he isn't pulling. That is where he is getting the 30% number, 70 x 0.7 = 49. The flaw in Troxx's logic is the Monk is only losing 30% DPS because he is pulling, NOT because the parser is wrong. Troxx isn't pulling, he is just sitting in camp DPSing and parsing. He is not losing any DPS, so there is no 30% loss for him. He is basically falsely assuming that if the Monk loses 30% DPS, everybody else is losing 30% DPS too. The parser is correct, and Troxx is wrong.

Either way, he basically has nothing to back up his silly points. The burden of proof now lies on him to either provide better data, or prove his parser is undervaluing all DPS by 30%, and not just the Monk who is pulling lol.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=638 - Here is real objective data for DPS comparisons between a Mage and a Shaman, using a level 49 Sebilis Mob. A Shaman can do 55.2 DPS, a Mage can do 82.7 with damage shield. The difference is only 27.5 DPS. This is a level 60 Mage vs. a level 60 Shaman, no clickies or mana buffs, and assuming the group is killing a mob every 36 seconds.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I see you haven't quite given up on this current thread just yet though. *chuckle* Take as much time as you need. You will certainly move on to hyper-focus on another thread/topic in which you'll continue to demonstrate your seemingly-apparent autism to all neurotypicals who encounter your posts.
I can only speak for myself, but your inevitable concession in silence for this thread is accepted in advance. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Here is Troxx's data for reference. It is using his own standards of being in a group for an extended period of time. He is doing... 79 DPS (without damage shield). It is the precise number I calculated. His DPS is 40 simply because he is nuking more per encounter, but math-wise this also means they aren't pulling mobs that fast. His previous encounter data shows an average kill speed of 36 seconds, and he has yet to provide average kill speed for this data set.

There are two ways you can interpret this data:

1. You can believe Troxx, who is claiming his DPS parser is undervaluing the data by 30%. If that is true, then honestly all of the data he has posted so far is meaningless because his parser is wrong, and he needs to get a better parser.

2. GamParse did it's job and parsed Troxx's DPS correctly. The reason why he thinks the data is undervalued by 30% is because his similarly equipped Monk can do 70 DPS when he isn't pulling. That is where he is getting the 30% number, 70 x 0.7 = 49. The flaw in Troxx's logic is the Monk is only losing 30% DPS because he is pulling, NOT because the parser is wrong. Troxx isn't pulling, he is just sitting in camp DPSing and parsing. He is not losing any DPS, so there is no 30% loss for him. He is basically falsely assuming that if the Monk loses 30% DPS, everybody else is losing 30% DPS too. The parser is correct, and Troxx is wrong.

Either way, he basically has nothing to back up his silly points. The burden of proof now lies on him to either provide better data, or prove his parser is undervaluing all DPS by 30%, and not just the Monk who is pulling lol.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=638 - Here is real objective data for DPS comparisons between a Mage and a Shaman, using a level 49 Sebilis Mob. A Shaman can do 55.2 DPS, a Mage can do 82.7 with damage shield. The difference is only 27.5 DPS. This is a level 60 Mage vs. a level 60 Shaman, no clickies or mana buffs, and assuming the group is killing a mob every 36 seconds.

This is the undisputable data, using Troxx's data too. Please ignore the trolls like cyxthryth.