Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Class Discussions > Priests

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-30-2024, 10:52 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,284
Default

As an example you (as a damn shaman) have 100 more ac than my warrior:

https://wiki.project1999.com/Magelo_Blue:Bedavir

How relevant are your current experiences to a leveling shaman (not a raid twink) levels 54-60?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-30-2024, 11:42 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,205
Default

Here are 3 PoM Rat Maze fight logs from my Shadowknight:

 

"[Sun Jul 30 14:06:44 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 122",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:06:46 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 85",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:06:46 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:06:51 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:06:53 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:06:53 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:03 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 52",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:05 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:07 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:09 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 63",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:30 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 68",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:32 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 101",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:36 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:38 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 74",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:38 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 90",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:43 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 63",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:45 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:45 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 68",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:47 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:49 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:53 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:53 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 36",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:56 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:57 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:58 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 63",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:02 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:04 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:06 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 31",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:08 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 42",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:11 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:13 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:17 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 95",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:17 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 74",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:19 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:21 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:23 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 101",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:25 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 95",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:27 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 58",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:32 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:36 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 36",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:38 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 74",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:40 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 128",

"[Sun Jul 30 14:06:44 2023] Ratman Rager bashes YOU for 34",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:07:15 2023] Ratman Rager bashes YOU for 29",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:02 2023] Ratman Rager bashes YOU for 28",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:25 2023] Ratman Rager bashes YOU for 31",

"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:10 2023] Ratman Rager kicks YOU for 26",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:08:41 2023] Ratman Rager kicks YOU for 31",

2318 over 117 seconds = 19.8 DPS unslowed.

"[Tue Aug 01 15:16:57 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 85",
"[Tue Aug 01 15:17:00 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 63",
"[Tue Aug 01 15:17:08 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 95",
"[Tue Aug 01 15:17:10 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 42",
"[Tue Aug 01 15:17:14 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 47",
"[Tue Aug 01 15:17:16 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Tue Aug 01 15:17:18 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 111",
"[Tue Aug 01 15:17:20 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 36",
"[Tue Aug 01 15:17:20 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 26",
"[Tue Aug 01 15:17:24 2023] Ratman Rager hits YOU for 47",

"[Tue Aug 01 15:17:11 2023] Ratman Rager kicks YOU for 26",

"[Tue Aug 01 15:17:03 2023] Ratman Rager bashes YOU for 28",

632 over 27 seconds = 23.4 DPS unslowed.

"[Sun Jul 30 14:01:27 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 28",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:01:27 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 93",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:01:36 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 28",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:01:36 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 99",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:01:38 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 28",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:01:40 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 33",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:01:48 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 82",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:01:54 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 55",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:01:59 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 38",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:07 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 104",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:07 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 28",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:15 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 28",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:21 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 93",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:27 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 121",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:32 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 33",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:36 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 28",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:36 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 82",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:43 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 28",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:51 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 28",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:53 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 82",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:57 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 66",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:57 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 28",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:03:09 2023] A Ratfink hits YOU for 28",

"[Sun Jul 30 14:01:27 2023] A Ratfink kicks YOU for 36",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:32 2023] A Ratfink kicks YOU for 28",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:56 2023] A Ratfink kicks YOU for 28",

"[Sun Jul 30 14:01:36 2023] A Ratfink bashes YOU for 28",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:07 2023] A Ratfink bashes YOU for 32",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:15 2023] A Ratfink bashes YOU for 31",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:23 2023] A Ratfink bashes YOU for 35",
"[Sun Jul 30 14:02:39 2023] A Ratfink bashes YOU for 28",

1507 over 102 seconds = 14.77 DPS unslowed.



Here are 189850 melee attempts from my logs against Bazgek:

 

91883 misses
74550 hits
6414 dodges
7268 ripostes
9735 parries

189850 melee attempts, including kick/bash made against bazgek
23417 dodges + ripostes + parries

23417 / 189850 = 12.33 percent chance


From the data above:

19.33 DPS over 3 fights from a Ratman Rage or Ratfink.

12.33% chance to dodge, riposte, or parry. Even though Shamans have dodge, I'll just apply the full 12.33%

So we can say ~22 DPS on a Shaman when excluding these. We can bump it to 25 DPS assuming I have less AC than my SK.

25 DPS x 0.33 (67% slow from Togor's) = 8.25 DPS.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-30-2024, 11:57 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,284
Default

Apples and carrots man.

Shadowknights and shamans are not the same class. Different ac returns. Wildly different defensive abilities and skills. Slowed vs unslowed. Your sk is 60 and is not geared to a typical level of a leveling anything (your magelo is in your signature).

About 10 levels of degrees/variables of difference not accounted for …

You’re taking parsed from a plate TANK (and geared well) and trying to extrapolate that to a leveling priest class defensively?

No conclusions are possible.

Do you understand the scientific method? Controlling for as many variables as possible minus what you are looking to measure/compare?

I am really skeptical at this point man …
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-31-2024, 08:15 AM
Duik Duik is offline
Planar Protector

Duik's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Near the largest canyon in the world!
Posts: 2,983
Default

Why are we using SK damage parses for our data?
Here is a "random" parse of a totally unrelated plate class with upper range gear in lots of slots.
Does not compute.
Talkin' apples and oranges or what?

Now, I dunno the actual difference but imma suggest a 50 - 58 shm in good ec gear wiff a sprinkle of no drop goodies the higher you get would be splattered by a mob a 60 SK farms for uno cards. No science or parses to prove it. But ya know. Extra Pol Ation is three words that exist and mean something.
NVM. Tell us more of your 60 SK as proof of xping a mid 50's shaman with a Jarlsberg Bone Bracer (of any race).

Go.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-31-2024, 10:44 AM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why are we using SK damage parses for our data?
Troxx has no parses at all, so his claims are 100% unfounded currently. Ask him for data lol.

I have actual parses from PoM Rat Maze. I removed dodge/parry/riposte from the equation and added a little more than 10% damage to boot. That changed 20 DPS parsed to 25 DPS predicted, which is a 25% increase in damage. That's a pretty big boost in damage.

Troxx is going to need to provide evidence that a level 58 Shaman is going to take at least 50% more damage than my 59 SK at the time in PoM Rat Maze to shift the 10 DPS number I provided here https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=523 to a higher number.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7thGate [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
DSM, you're not correct about the DOT calculation.
I am using a normal distribution for the DoT proc, not a binomial distribution. All of my averages are normal distributions.

If you want to claim I am doing the normal distribution wrong, please show us your math for a normal distribution of procced DoT damage.

My math is here, and it already takes into account the different points at which the DoT could trigger in a fight:

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=646

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7thGate [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is not the case with a DOT proc because every proc is not equally valuable, you have to calculate the contribution each branch makes to the average individually and sum them to get the correct average.
I already did that in my Normal Distribution:

Quote:
[208, 184, 136, 88, 40] = (656 damage / 4 ticks points + 1 initial DD) = (131.2 damage / 60 seconds) x 1.0 PPM = 2.18 DPS on average
These are the possible DoT damage values that could occur in a minute long fight, assuming you can swing 5 times per minute and have 1 PPM. Remember each swing has an equal chance to proc. If you proc again, just add 40 damage per proc.

208 damage = proccing at 12 seconds (40 + 7 ticks of 24 damage), 184 = proccing at 24 seconds (40 + 5 ticks of 24 damage), etc.
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 01-31-2024 at 11:08 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-31-2024, 09:59 AM
Toxigen Toxigen is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 4,776
Default

imagine typing that much when iksar is best
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-31-2024, 11:07 AM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,284
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
imagine typing that much when iksar is best
I still like scratching my ass
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-31-2024, 11:59 AM
Toxigen Toxigen is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 4,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I still like scratching my ass
dont neglect the balls
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-31-2024, 12:57 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,205
Default

I think I see some of the confusion people have with the DoT damage averages on a Normal Distribution.

The main issue with DoTs is they do have a cap, because proccing them again doesn't give you double DoT damage. However, you can only get 2 procs per minute at maximum, which means this really isn't a problem in practice. Basically if you could get 132 PPM (1 proc per second), you would only do 544 DoT Damage + 132 x 40 Direct Damage = 5,824 Damage. A 100 Damage DD would do 13200 Damage by comparison.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=523 - In this example the JBB Shaman with Blight, Hammer of the Scourge is enganged in a fight that lasts 132 seconds. The Proc is a spell called Scourge, which lasts 126 seconds, and does 40 DD + 24 Damage a tick.

The Shaman has 1.3 PPM normally because they have 135 DEX. Since they are spamming JBB, they get 7.5/12.77 swings. This means your PPM is reduced to 0.76 PPM after accounting for the number of missed swings.

Here are the possible places you can proc and tick, since we are casting JBB. I am assuming the cast starts halfway through the first two ticks, which is why we start at 3 seconds. The numbers in paranthesis are ticks, and the bracketed number is the 0.5 swings triggering:

(0), 3, (6), 11, (12), (18), 19, (24), 27, (30), 35, (36), (42), 43, (48), (54), 51, [59], (60)

Using the numbers above, we could get a full 10 ticks from the DoT if you land it at the start. Our damage table will have 8 values for the 8 places where you could proc.

I will be using (t=x) to describe the seconds at which the proc occured. t=3 is 3 seconds into the fight:

[280 (t=3), 256 (t=11), 208 (t=19), 184 (t=27), 160 (t=35), 112 (t=43), 64 (t=51), 40 (t=59)] = (1304 damage / 8 values) = (163 average damage / 60 seconds) = 2.72 DPS x 0.76 PPM = 2.06 DPS

The 0.76 PPM is taking into account the chance of simply not procing at all. It is the same with DD Procs. If you have 0.5 PPM and your DD proc does 400 damage, you would end up doing (400 damage / 60 seconds) = 0.66 DPS x 0.5 PPM = 0.33 DPS.

Because the fight lasts 2 minutes, you have a total of 1.56 procs. This means you are guaranteed 1 DoT proc somehwere within the fight on average. The DoT lasts two minutes, so it can last the full duration of the fight. This means you have 4 possibilities on average: [Max DoT Damage, Zero Dot Damage, 1/4 DoT Damage, 3/4 DoT Damage] = [544, 0, 160, 400] = (1104 / 4) = 276 / 132 = 2.09 DPS, which is basically number we got from the 1 minute fight.

Since we do have the 0.56 procs still floating around, you would get an extra 40 DD half of the fights. So an extra 40 damage x 0.5 PPM = 20 damage / 132 seconds = 0.15 DPS.

So the total DPS would be 2.2 DPS per 2 minute fight, which is what I was using originally. Remember this still does not include white damage.
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 01-31-2024 at 01:25 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-31-2024, 01:41 PM
Ripqozko Ripqozko is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 2,071
Default

DSM is the new kittens, enjoy apping
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.