******Official politics thread ******

[Pokesan]

https://twitter.com/classiclib3ral/s...11123394793472

[AzzarTheGod]

u mad im plankin on the clintons

ABC news 20/20 aint no infowars boy

[AzzarTheGod]

dunks that I would have went with

https://twitter.com/classiclib3ral/s...70597232795648

more poignant and arguably more relevant. the SOUND OF SILENCE BABY

[Pokesan]

nah the pages from today aren't readable

did u say a dumb thing?

[AzzarTheGod]

Never overestimate my thread reading.

9/7/2017 is looking skimmish.

[mickmoranis]

where is big j?

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In her new book, Clinton blamed Bernie Sanders for "copying her policies", "making unrealistic promises", and "purposefully disrupting the Democratic party". I'm so happy that fucking cunt isn't president. (But not as happy as I am sad that Trump is)

Expect more of the same in 2020 though.

its going to be hilarious when hes the best shot the dems have in 2020 and they cant win becuse of her attacks.

Remember

1. Bernie is sexist, becuse he said he would love to have her as a vice president.

2. Bernie defended Hillary from the beginning of the campaign.

3. Hillary mocked sander's "unrealistic goals" in the first democratic debate right out the fucking gate.

4. Hillary and her campaign were relentless with attacks saying he had no experience, creating a narrative that he was not qualified to be president.

5. Bernie in response to that said that he didn't think that she was qualified to be president, specifically because of her ties to wall street. which was later spun to be "sanders doesnt think a woman is qualified to be president" by the hillary campaign, here we see the birth of the divisive moniker 'bernie bro'

6. Hillary makes up stories about how not only has her administration not made any attacks against bernie, but he has been free from them from the republican party, insinuating 1. that its not fair and 2. that is some how a bad thing?

5. Hillary says bernie is not a democrat

6. Bernie decides to go against his oath to not make political attacks against hillary, becuse “I’m not going to get beaten up, I’m not getting lied about. We will fight back.”

7. This list could go on and on but lets just jump to the last attack that bernie made against Hillary Clinton where he said that he thinks she would make a fine president but wouldn't be capable of leading a political revolution, which of course, she was not thanks to her divisive campaign that destroyed the entire democratic party and left it in control of people like pokesan and other male virgins and fat girls with colored hair. I guess not lying to Americans is some how considered an attack by the Hillary campaign. Im sure she lost because of him and Russians right?

But you know, its great that the 'woman for the people' has spent the last 8 months of #resist not doing anything to help except write another scowling attack on any hope for party unity so she could make another million bucks. Good on you dems, good on your fight and god speed. I on the other hand will enjoy living in red states, where people are actually kind to each other, work hard for their families and spend real time with their friends, instead of scowling at twitter with their arms crossed upset while not doing anything to change their shitty life because its not fair that its not likely we'll have a LGBT president anytime soon.

[Rader]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you may well be right, but I think it is dangerous to argue that more wealthy individuals is more harmful than fewer. Is society more threatened by having a single disadvantages individual with fewer resources than everyone else than it is by having a single individual with vastly more resources than everyone else?

I think the degree of inequality is vastly more important and as I've said before, I do not believe society really benefits from exceptionally wealthy individuals. Society benefits from investment and production. Those things come from business.

The key is for there to be equality in opportunity, and an inequality of results. Hard work and effort and risk-taking must be seen as the means to achieve a bigger share than their neighbors, otherwise we will all eventually end up sitting at home, smoking dope and playing video games all day. If opportunity is not perceived as equal, people think the game is rigged and won't play. If everyone gets the same results no matter what they do, people sit on their butts just the same because there is no incentive to suffer the pain of hard work and sacrifice. That is why this whole "equality" argument is a bunch of BS and counterproductive to the long term success of humanity. The existence of inequality of results is not evidence of some evil force screwing you over, it is a good thing, AS LONG AS THERE IS EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY. Of course, humans are generally pretty stupid and prone to blaming inequality on a lack of opportunity, rather than their own personal failure.

[Pokesan]

fuck off both of you

[Rader]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

fuck off both of you

Failure, libturd 101, call us racist misogynist homophobes first, then tell us to F off.