Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #601  
Old 10-31-2014, 04:16 PM
Lazie Lazie is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sirken said "we aren't changing shit" but TMO and IB don't want anything changed either. If for the first time in the goddamn history of the server EVERY guild agreed to something, anything, then I think the staff would take a good long look at it and it could probably get changed.

Right now there's no impetus to change anything because TMO isn't backing down. Maybe I'll go talk to Getsome/Hoku and get them on board, then IB can be the hero and TMO will be the only guild stopping progress.
Looks like you are the one being difficult with valid options on the table.
  #602  
Old 10-31-2014, 04:17 PM
arsenalpow arsenalpow is offline
Planar Protector

arsenalpow's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Juryiel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It puts in perspective the reasons, and saying the reasons makes you think about them consciously.

E.g. Currently a class C guild gets 10x of a mob for every 1x a class R guild gets. I would like to hear from class C themselves if this amount is really what they as individuals think is appropriate, rather than saying C/C/R or "we don't want to concede mobs" which obscures exactly how much more they get. This is beneficial for both class C themselves (they actually see the effect they have) and those who are trying to come to an agreement, to see where they stand. I bet that actual amount would cause some dissonance within class C ranks, they are people too after all [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Here's my back of the envelope math crunching the numbers
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood Hogan
The first thing you gotta' realize, brother, is this right here is the future of wrestling. You can call this the New World Order of Wrestling.
  #603  
Old 10-31-2014, 04:17 PM
Amirite Amirite is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
TMO will be the only guild stopping progress.
  #604  
Old 10-31-2014, 04:18 PM
arsenalpow arsenalpow is offline
Planar Protector

arsenalpow's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If the main objection to this is Class C getting fewer mobs (dunno if that's true), why not tweak it a bit? For example, a 3 mob bag limit for Class C guilds on FFA repops. I'd expect that a repop during high server population times would be highly contested with the smaller Class R guilds able to take a legit shot at a target and the Class C and large Class R guilds having to prioritize and maybe not fill their bags, while off-peak repops would favor the larger guilds (Class C, Taken, BDA, ??) and guilds that have different timezone presence (Europa, ??).
changing the bag limit to 3 only hurts the small guilds in the rotation, it doesn't affect Taken/BDA, I'd to see the limit to still be 2 to protect the smaller guilds

and

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
3) It really seems to me that the real issue here isn't being addressed and it's being covered up by bullshit. I think the real problem is that the rotations are getting longer and longer because more guilds are joining that rotation you've got going and Class-R mouths are hungry. In honestly, there doesn't need to be 13 Class-R guilds. Consider consolidating.
That's such a reach. The line has always been long and that's never the issue. If the line was too long someone would just break rank and smash mobs without regard for the rotation and yet it's been a year and no one has done that.
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood Hogan
The first thing you gotta' realize, brother, is this right here is the future of wrestling. You can call this the New World Order of Wrestling.
  #605  
Old 10-31-2014, 04:18 PM
Amirite Amirite is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Looks like you are the one being difficult with valid options on the table.
False. you are the one being difficult with valid options on the table.
  #606  
Old 10-31-2014, 04:18 PM
Raev Raev is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanable [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Increasing the number to compete for doesn't mean they will get them all. Especially not if they have to go to VP while 10 guilds get the pick of the litter for 30m-1h.
Oh, so we have to create rules to protect class C from competition.

You aren't wrong, I just find it amusing.
  #607  
Old 10-31-2014, 04:18 PM
Buhbuh Buhbuh is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,638
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sirken said "we aren't changing shit" but TMO and IB don't want anything changed either. If for the first time in the goddamn history of the server EVERY guild agreed to something, anything, then I think the staff would take a good long look at it and it could probably get changed.

Right now there's no impetus to change anything because TMO isn't backing down. Maybe I'll go talk to Getsome/Hoku and get them on board, then IB can be the hero and TMO will be the only guild stopping progress.
PvP solution? Red99.

Yes, I'm shameless.
  #608  
Old 10-31-2014, 04:20 PM
khanable khanable is offline
Planar Protector

khanable's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Plane of Rustles
Posts: 2,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Oh, so we have to create rules to protect class C from competition.

You aren't wrong, I just find it amusing.
I know I'm not wrong - and I'm not saying the stance is right or wrong to take, but we're all kidding ourselves here if we were to say this is not about gross % of actual pixel intake, and is about potential pixel intake.
__________________
hello i'm cucumbers
  #609  
Old 10-31-2014, 04:21 PM
Daldaen Daldaen is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Kedge Keep
Posts: 9,062
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metallikus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
that doesn't solve poopsocking. it just redefines it temporarily
Are groups of people shitting in a sock with their character logged in getting rebuffed, waiting at a zone line for a spawn?

No? Fantastic, it removes most poopsocking.

Having characters camped =/= poopsocking. It is dumb, but there is absolutely no way around it since everyone in high end guilds has multiple raid worthy Alts they camp out.

Full respawns were shot down. It sucks I agree. But it's time to make do with what we have.

Derubael stated he understands the necessity of having trackers. We need to limit the amount of people sitting in zones during windows (which my proposal limits), and we need to limit the amount of time these people sit there (which smaller variance limits).
Last edited by Daldaen; 10-31-2014 at 04:24 PM..
  #610  
Old 10-31-2014, 04:24 PM
arsenalpow arsenalpow is offline
Planar Protector

arsenalpow's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Are people shitting in a sock with their character logged in getting rebuffed, waiting at a zone line for a spawn?

No? Fantastic, it removes most poopsocking.

Having characters camped =/= poopsocking. It is dumb, but there is absolutely no way around it since everyone in high end guilds has multiple raid worthy Alts they camp out.

Full respawns were shot down. It sucks I agree. But it's time to make do with what we have.
full respawns have not been shut down, if TMO and IB in good faith agreed to my proposal and THEN Rogean shot it down then i'd be more inclined to find other avenues, and i'm talking they buy in wholeheartedly and Rogean denies it, not some pretend shit with a deal in an alley knowing that its going to get it stomped out
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood Hogan
The first thing you gotta' realize, brother, is this right here is the future of wrestling. You can call this the New World Order of Wrestling.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.