![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
In reality, you understand when politicans and the media say assault rifle, they don't mean class III weapons, right?
Thats the only definition that matters. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
Problem with gun laws is you give an inch they take a mile. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
They mean pistol grips, detatch mags, bayonet lugs, VFGs and stupid shit like that.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Way to steer away from the real arguement of whether or not fully automatic weapons are needed for home defense. You sound like the "liberal media" you seem to have problems with by talking about everything BUT the topic.
__________________
Current Games:
Naw | ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||||
|
Quote:
I think you're being stupid and confusing assault rifle with assault weapon, again.
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#6
|
|||
|
And fyi, the ATF classifies semi automatic AK/AR pattern rifles as Assault Rifles, even if semi-auto, anything that is select fire is considered a Machine gun.
Having filled out a ton of class III paperwork for both machine gun, suppressor, and short barrel rifles, their distinction, political distinction, and media distinction.. not wikipedia (And when did that become a reliable source for anything?) is the only relevant definition. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#9
|
||||
|
you're telling me that all of your buddies were using weapons without select-fire capabilities, then yes, by definition, they were using semi-automatic rifles without select-fire capabilities and thus weren't using an Assault rifle.
__________________
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
|||
|
Umm no converting an AR-15 to fully auto doesn't magically turn it into an M-16.
__________________
Current Games:
Naw | ||
|
Last edited by SamwiseRed; 11-10-2012 at 03:34 PM..
|
|
||
![]() |
|
|