|
|
#52
11-20-2011, 04:34 AM
|
|||
|
Whatever, you can do what you want Diggles, but the evidence and the numbers support my claims and my arguments. That and Rangers have the added advantage of not relying on gear nearly as much as a Warrior or Monk.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | ||
|
|
|||
|
#53
11-20-2011, 04:36 AM
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'd actually say it's cleric/tank/cc/backup healer/2 dps. But shaman are a much better backup healer than druids - as was already pointed out. On the other hand when I was leveling to 60 (I'm a warrior), I never turned down druids for groups unless we had 2 or 3 healers already. I was never into forming absolutely perfect groups. I think those people tend to spend too much time LFG only to log off or they have cleric/warrior/monk/enchanter/rogue/rogue then die because of a bad pull or respawn and the cleric can't heal the tank and the enchanter at the same time. However, I did a lot of duoing from 51-60 with my shaman friend which was faster xp than any group - and when we invited a druid along for a trio, the experience was god awful... | |||
|
|
||||
|
#54
11-20-2011, 04:36 AM
|
|||
|
you're honestly one of the stupidest people i have met on these forums if you think Rangers are the best dps.
Like, you make Visage look like a rocket scientist. I mained a ranger on Live and I dont even believe you. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#55
11-20-2011, 04:40 AM
|
|||
|
From 45-60, druids simply do not have a place in exp groups.
Did you see what the guy said about wizards? Now imagine a really crappy wizard that does much less than that. Did you see what I said about healing? 1 minute of experience for 10 minutes of meditation does not equal an imperfect experience group. It equals a group wipe or a group leaving. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#56
11-20-2011, 04:41 AM
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#57
11-20-2011, 04:41 AM
|
|||
|
Do believe you're mistaken bro.
Rangers, at least as far as I remember, didn't start out dpsing even Warriors until around Luclin, and even then it required the best gear available to them. The guild I was in had 1 raiding Ranger and we only brought him along for whatever that disc was they had that made them basically unkillable for 15 or so seconds to give our Warrior enough time to build up aggro. I could be wrong, but this is what I remember raiding Classic/Kunark/Velious on Veeshan server. Did some research and yeah, Rangers didn't even start popping up on the DPS charts until Endless Quiver+Trueshot, and as far as I know it was a *long* time before they ever even came close to Rogues, so in this version of the game, Rangers are still pretty much shit for DPS. Even in the utility department they don't have much going for them, and there are other classes that can do it much better than they can. | ||
|
Last edited by GETINMYVAN; 11-20-2011 at 04:48 AM..
|
|
||
|
#59
11-20-2011, 04:48 AM
|
|||
|
Rangers are the worst class because of many things.
1, they can pull great dps, this also leads to fucking retarded amounts of hate and they cant tank 2, this retarded amount of hate = cannot dps to full extent or they die 3, worst hybrid, druid + warrior = squishy jack of no trades 4, they're used as trackbots | ||
|
|
|||
|
#60
11-20-2011, 04:49 AM
|
||||
|
Quote:
You know what, I'm just gonna move to Red99. Seeya guys, look for Foxhound somewhere in EC. | |||
|
|
||||
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
