Vote for the worst race/class combo (I'll be playing this)

[Clownface]

I played a gnome warrior as my main on SZ and pwned anybody/everybody.

[pickled_heretic]

i don't know how human enchanter is even on the list. they're ugly as sin but stats on a caster don't matter very much and the human's stats aren't even that bad. their deficit in int (laughably easy to increase with stat gear, assuming you even really care to increase it) is made up for by their high str and stam.

[Softcore PK]

Erudite cleric, gnome rogue, half elf ranger and human enchanter don't belong on list. Add half elf druid, gnome cleric imo.

and the warrior doesn't have to be gnome, can be any race.

[pickled_heretic]

Originally Posted by Softcore PK [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

and the warrior doesn't have to be gnome, can be any race.

not everyone is going to be running around south karana / OoT until lvl 50.

higher damage tables, innate MR, best hp/ac (after an AC fix presumably), these things are all going to make warriors formidable opponents indoors.

[Softcore PK]

Originally Posted by pickled_heretic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

not everyone is going to be running around south karana / OoT until lvl 50.

higher damage tables, innate MR, best hp/ac (after an AC fix presumably), these things are all going to make warriors formidable opponents indoors.

This thread wasn't specifically about pvp. Good luck making it to 50 as a tank that can't hold agro :P

[pickled_heretic]

gnome rogue definitely belongs, worst statted rogue imo.

warriors have always had problems with aggro, to a point. however the time you lose exping with a warrior because of aggro issues is made up for with the exp bonus that he subsidizes to the group.

and at 50 it isn't really an issue anymore.

[Softcore PK]

Originally Posted by pickled_heretic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

gnome rogue definitely belongs, worst statted rogue imo.

warriors have always had problems with aggro, to a point. however the time you lose exping with a warrior because of aggro issues is made up for with the exp bonus that he subsidizes to the group.

and at 50 it isn't really an issue anymore.

Dark elves have worse rogue stats. And the exp bonus is so so so slight it won't help in the least.

[Envious]

Originally Posted by juicedsixfo

Just group with a Shadowknight, problem solved. Or if not, Obsidian Shards help out tremendously with aggro retention.

Yeah... Softcore apparently has no fucking clue what she is talking about.

Warriors hold aggro fine. Just can't be a dunce.

[Envious]

Originally Posted by Softcore PK

Dark elves have worse rogue stats. And the exp bonus is so so so slight it won't help in the least.

10%?

[pickled_heretic]

Originally Posted by Softcore PK [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dark elves have worse rogue stats. And the exp bonus is so so so slight it won't help in the least.

compare a 10% warrior bonus to a 68% deficit with a troll sk. it makes a huge difference. warriors level up literally twice as fast. when that bonus is distributed to the group it means a 16% increase in the amount of exp the party receives when compared to a troll sk.

now tell me that receiving literally 16% more exp per kill is not worth having to root a mob or two now and then.