Veeshan's Peak

[Extunarian]

Using /petition in Veeshan's Peak should DT the petitioner.

[Slathar]

I'm not sure you guys understand the amount of griefing that will take place if the VP key remains soul-bound.

Scenario: I'm a VP keyed monk. I have corpsed myself outside of VP so there is no risk of losing my gear. I loot my Shiny Brass Idol and zone into VP. The mechanics of FD on this server allow me to Feign Death around w/o ever aggroing mobs. So I can slowly make my way through the zone until I approach a raid. I stand up and click my Shiny Brass Idol and bring a train onto the heads of the raid. There is no PvP so I don't need to worry about that. I just need to worry about lasting long enough to get the mobs to the raid.

I die, oh well I'm only 90% into level 60 now. I lost maybe 30 minutes of time.

I can't wait.

[burkemi5]

Sounds great Rogean. Noob question, but what is CS?

Also, I think it would neat to see some sort of rule policing how VP and the other bosses work. For example, if you kill 3 or more bosses in VP, you are banned from killing Trak/PoF/PoH for one spawn or something along those lines. Granted, this would be difficult and time consuming to police, but it would give opportunities to other guilds to become competitive. Just my 2 cents!

[Mardur]

If you guys don't like randoming for raid content, feel free to stop by the PVP server where you can slay your way to success.

[Softcore PK]

Why can't you just agree to take turns?

[Lazortag]

If there's no CS involvement that doesn't necessarily mean there will be a massive train/KS fest. I'm sure TR/TMO could agree to something if things became too chaotic. If not, well, at least it will make the forum drama that much more funny.

Also I know that CS was allowed to be involved at some point in the timeline, I'm not sure when, but I know that a GM once intervened when two guilds zoned into VP at the same time and gave them a few choices for ways that they could resolve their dispute (one choice was having a member of each guild duel each other for the rights to the zone).

[Slathar]

Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If there's no CS involvement that doesn't necessarily mean there will be a massive train/KS fest. I'm sure TR/TMO could agree to something if things became too chaotic. If not, well, at least it will make the forum drama that much more funny.

Also I know that CS was allowed to be involved at some point in the timeline, I'm not sure when, but I know that a GM once intervened when two guilds zoned into VP at the same time and gave them a few choices for ways that they could resolve their dispute (one choice was having a member of each guild duel each other for the rights to the zone).

What about unguilded individuals training for no reason? That would be within the rules set forth by the server administrators as it is explicitly mentioned CSR will not become involved for any reason.

[Gwence]

you're no where near good enough to do the things you're saying you are going to do

[Slathar]

Originally Posted by Gwence [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you're no where near good enough to do the things you're saying you are going to do

You've obviously never been in VP or understand how easy it is to train people there. You are obviously insane or stupid if you think it takes a modicum of talent to do what I'm describing.

[Dr4z3r]

Originally Posted by Softcore PK [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why can't you just agree to take turns?

Originally Posted by Shiftin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

- Rogean told us privately the day of the patch to come to an agreement regarding VP. Both sides made concessions and we presented a plan for a modified, time-limited rotation to rogean that same weekend. It was basically instantly rejected and we were told Nilbog wanted to talk to us about it.