Interesting read.

[Arrisard]

So, lets name as much as we can that is the reality of almost any program installed on a PC these days to rouse the lay-sheep hordes into a frenzy?

Oh no, a game that requires an internet connection knows my local routing structure, UNBELIEVABLE. They know my Windows logon name ... it's part of the file structure and what the hell program doesn't access the user directory these days - hint, EQ does on Windows 7 if you install to one of the Program Files!

(I'm not saying Rogean and company aren't hax0ring your megahurtz or you shouldn't remain vigilant, however, what's been posted is sounds like complete bullshit so far. Dihydrogen Monoxide kills, ban it!)

[soup]

Originally Posted by mitic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

so what do you realy expext other than answers you dont like over your remarks that our devs COULD do something shady? they always tried the best to give us a cheatfree environment to play

Yet again I'm not even sure what you're trying to say?

I've made it as blatantly clear as I possibly can that I don't think they're doing anything shady, so I'm not sure what you're even saying with stuff like "answers you don't like"

[soup]

Originally Posted by Arrisard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So, lets name as much as we can that is the reality of almost any program installed on a PC these days to rouse the lay-sheep hordes into a frenzy?

Oh no, a game that requires an internet connection knows my local routing structure, UNBELIEVABLE. They know my Windows logon name ... it's part of the file structure and what the hell program doesn't access the user directory these days - hint, EQ does on Windows 7 if you install to one of the Program Files!

(I'm not saying Rogean and company aren't hax0ring your megahurtz or you shouldn't remain vigilant, however, what's been posted is sounds like complete bullshit so far. Dihydrogen Monoxide kills, ban it!)

It sounds like there's just as much of a frenzy in the opposite direction.

"It -could- do some stuff that people may not approve of. It probably isn't, and I don't think it is nor do I think the developer's are doing anything shady at all. I would just like to know a little more about it, that's it. Let me reiterate that I do not think they are up to anything remotely malicious."

and that is followed with replies like

"WTF why are you in such a paranoid frenzy!?!"

[mitic]

Originally Posted by soup [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yet again I'm not even sure what you're trying to say?

I've made it as blatantly clear as I possibly can that I don't think they're doing anything shady, so I'm not sure what you're even saying with stuff like "answers you don't like"

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[soup]

Originally Posted by mitic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You seem like quite the literate & articulate individual.

[Arrisard]

Originally Posted by soup [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It sounds like there's just as much of a frenzy in the opposite direction.

"It -could- do some stuff that people may not approve of. It probably isn't, and I don't think it is nor do I think the developer's are doing anything shady at all. I would just like to know a little more about it, that's it. Let me reiterate that I do not think they are up to anything remotely malicious."

and that is followed with replies like

"WTF why are you in such a paranoid frenzy!?!"

My post had nothing to do with the responses, only the unreferenced and overtly vague references mentioned in the link OP provided.

[soup]

Originally Posted by Arrisard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My post had nothing to do with the responses, only the unreferenced and overtly vague references mentioned in the link OP provided.

Fair enough [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Either way though, it still seems like there's just as much backlash in the other direction.

[Arrisard]

Originally Posted by soup [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Fair enough [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Either way though, it still seems like there's just as much backlash in the other direction.

Absolutely true. I did state that it doesn't mean that Rogean et all aren't about to rape you all and that it shouldn't be looked at further. Only that what's been offered so far is not very compelling in the least bit.

[mitic]

Originally Posted by soup [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You seem like quite the literate & articulate individual.

whats so hard to understand? u keep pointing out that fraud can occur due to the current files stored on our computers. just stop posting things like this even if you dont think nilbog and staff would do that. you are just feeding the trolls in here with statements like this

[soup]

Originally Posted by mitic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

whats so hard to understand? u keep pointing out that fraud can occur due to the current files stored on our computers. just stop posting things like this even if you dont think nilbog and staff would do that. you are just feeding the trolls in here with statements like this

You are correct to an extent.

At the same time though, it's not my place to tell people who they should trust.

In any case, my original post wasn't supposed to be conspiracy theory shit. It was supposed to be taken the same way as something like, I don't know. Say you loan your friend your car so he can run to the store and pick up beer, and winds up taking a little longer than expected because he runs into a friend at the store and they chat. Meanwhile, back at home, you're sitting there joking with something like "Damnit, I knew that bastard was going to steal my car and skip town."