Post the Hottest Shit - Page 6

Ooloo · #1 10-14-2021, 03:50 PM

Joe didn't bully him he was being jovial with a smile most of the time and even said he's a nice guy.

He was also totally right, and Sanjay admitted as much, if a bit sheepishly.

CNN completely lied, showed their hand and revealed their obvious bias for the billionth time, and Joe was maybe a little peeved that they were lying about him. If a doctor prescribed you an antibiotic, and that same antibiotic is sometimes used in cats, it doesn't mean you're taking cat medicine. That's not how medicine or science works, and Joe was rightly pissed about it.

EDIT: Me and starkind with almost identical posts

Whale biologist · #2 10-14-2021, 04:07 PM

We don't have long term data on using it as an antiviral, you dipshit.

Gatordash · #3 10-14-2021, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We don't have long term data on using it as an antiviral, you dipshit.

We don't have long term data on the vaccine being used against coronavirus either.

Whale biologist · #4 10-14-2021, 04:41 PM

You need medical training to parse these things correctly. Like it says the antiviral effectiveness has not been proven in vivo and I think that means in a living body, but I am a huge dumbass so ???

Ooloo · #5 10-14-2021, 04:49 PM

You're just moving the goalposts. You asked for a source, I gave you a perfectly legitimate source, and then you go "Welll I'm not a doctor." Like then why did you ask for a source?

I already said this is just evidence, and good evidence, but not a conclusion. The people ranting about horse paste have no expertise either, why do you just automatically go with them?

Ooloo · #6 10-14-2021, 04:51 PM

No, you're lying. Your post that said "source?" was in direct response to me saying "it shows antiviral activity".

It *does*, it's a scientific fact. It is also *expected* to show antiviral activity against covid-19 specifically, but more research needs to be conducted.

That is hardly "horse paste bad lol".

Whale biologist · #7 10-14-2021, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're just moving the goalposts. You asked for a source, I gave you a perfectly legitimate source, and then you go "Welll I'm not a doctor." Like then why did you ask for a source?

I already said this is just evidence, and good evidence, but not a conclusion. The people ranting about horse paste have no expertise either, why do you just automatically go with them?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, you're lying. Your post that said "source?" was in direct response to me saying "it shows antiviral activity".

It *does*, it's a scientific fact. It is also *expected* to show antiviral activity against covid-19 specifically, but more research needs to be conducted.

That is hardly "horse paste bad lol".

You being functionally illiterate is not me lying. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quote:

the antiviral activity of ivermectin has not been consistently proven in vivo.

Ooloo · #8 10-14-2021, 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You being functionally illiterate is not me lying. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you know the difference between a hypothesis and a conclusion, while you're calling me illiterate?

If something has not been "conclusively proven", that's very different than "there is no evidence for this at all and it is almost certainly false", which is how the media spun ivermectin. This paper directly contradicts that. BTW the media were also spreading paranoid hypochondria about monoclonal antibodies when trump was taking them, but now ooooops turns out they are super valuable! Womp womp.

The theory of relativity has not been "conclusively proven" either, there's just a mountain of evidence to support it. Same for evolution, same for the age of the earth and the universe. And I'm assuming you accept those things?

Botten · #9 10-14-2021, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, you're lying. Your post that said "source?" was in direct response to me saying "it shows antiviral activity".

It *does*, it's a scientific fact. It is also *expected* to show antiviral activity against covid-19 specifically, but more research needs to be conducted.

That is hardly "horse paste bad lol".

Two ppl have died from using it in New Mexico.

It alters RNA just like the Vaccine (so no excuse can be made to take it over the vaccine.)

India stopped using it after they found in a study it did nothing. It is literally hydroxychloroquine all over again and right leaning groups are making a ton of money off of it.

Ooloo · #10 10-14-2021, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Two ppl have died from using it in New Mexico.

It alters RNA just like the Vaccine (so no excuse can be made to take it over the vaccine.)

India stopped using it after they found in a study it did nothing. It is literally hydroxychloroquine all over again and right leaning groups are making a ton of money off of it.

No, it's not. Read the paper I posted.