I don't care what political, cultural. or social values u hold

[Gwaihir]

Why do they call it Sophistry? What is the root of the word? Or should I say, "Who" is the root of the Form?

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why do they call it Sophistry? What is the root of the word? Or should I say, "Who" is the root of the Form?

Based on who is asking, I'm going to guess your answer is Jewish people.

[Gwaihir]

No. What is the root of "Sophistry"

We gno that philo-sophy translates as "love of wisdom" but the "istry" means "of the school of"

So what is the root?

I'm super baby stepping this one for you. Show me you're a thinking thing.

[Pulgasari]

pretty sure the answer is lesbians 💯

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by starkind [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Idk. Lesbianism implies this monolithic sexuality that's like very restrictive and exclusive. Also sexuality isn't really relevant to world domination or efficiency. I guess under certain circumstances and contexts it could be relevant, in that case polygamy is probably the ideal way for babies to get made and raised, but u seriously run into the pitfall of a weak male breeding with lots of females. So maybe there's just not one good solution to eugenics.

Anyway. The reality is that breeding and heritage is less important than individual skill and ability and always has been. Any thought patterns to the contrary are just a trap in which the individual is placed within a generalized group.

The first black men to free themselves probably didn't place such labels and restrictions on themselves.

As if a weak male would ever make it through the neverending barrage of Charisma and Fortitude checks the women subconsciously lob their way.

Do you think any woman, let alone many of women, would ever mate with someone like Horza? His bitch management skills consist of:
Being more emotional than a woman
Placating and supplicating to his betters

[starkind]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As if a weak male would...

Oof, that's harsh criticism. But have to agree. Especially on principle.

I was thinking some kinda ritualistic system with some meritorious competition or combative components thrown into the mix. As it is, breeding is privilege to create life, throwing death or worse in the mix seems appropriate and reasonable.

Anyway rituals and tradition can be usurped and corrupted, so then again we fall into that issue of a kind of rigid monocultural or monolithic system.

I guess it sucks to be most Americans, but it does get better dudes. Once u stop relying on others to uplift u. Or fix the world or make everything and everyone safe.

[Pulgasari]

Originally Posted by starkind [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oof, that's harsh criticism. But have to agree. Especially on principle.

I was thinking some kinda ritualistic system with some meritorious competition or combative components thrown into the mix. As it is, breeding is privilege to create life, throwing death or worse in the mix seems appropriate and reasonable.

Anyway rituals and tradition can be usurped and corrupted, so then again we fall into that issue of a kind of rigid monocultural or monolithic system.

I guess it sucks to be most Americans, but it does get better dudes. Once u stop relying on others to uplift u. Or fix the world or make everything and everyone safe.

Creating life is a natural right. China tried to restrict it because China sucks.

[starkind]

Tldr ritual lesbian combat for surrogate stock?

[Gwaihir]

So, basically, what you're saying is I should perform a hostile corporate takeover of Tyson, consolidate a loyal cult-following, and then springboard from there into global domination? Athena would be pleased.

[starkind]

Originally Posted by Pulgasari [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

pretty sure the answer is lesbians ��

Idk. Lesbianism implies this monolithic sexuality that's like very restrictive and exclusive. Also sexuality isn't really relevant to world domination or efficiency. I guess under certain circumstances and contexts it could be relevant, in that case polygamy is probably the ideal way for babies to get made and raised, but u seriously run into the pitfall of a weak male breeding with lots of females. So maybe there's just not one good solution to eugenics.

Anyway. The reality is that breeding and heritage is less important than individual skill and ability and always has been. Any thought patterns to the contrary are just a trap in which the individual is placed within a generalized group.

The first black men to free themselves probably didn't place such labels and restrictions on themselves.

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So, basically, what you're saying is I should perform a hostile corporate takeover of Tyson, consolidate a loyal cult-following, and then springboard from there into global domination? Athena would be pleased.

Sure, [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And tbqvfh. We'd all probably be better for it if u (or several) ppl were successful.