![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
Not surprising that a bassist wouldn't care for someone like Satch though, the bassist (or drummer for that matter) never does anything interesting in his songs. I'm all for extended solos and 'shreddy' music in general whether it's Wooten, Malmsteen, Coltrane, Vivaldi, or this: <iframe width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/XMouQdQwS3k" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> | |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
Certain pick-ups, strings, head units, speakers etc. give off different tones when you modulate them. For example, I get a totally different tone when playing through a 2x15 than I do through a 4x10 because it moves bigger and lower sounds, if I use flatwounds over roundwounds I get a more rounded "damper" sound, if I use tube driven heads I get harder distortions and warmer tones. Guitar players get a much thicker, aggressive tone when playing through bass cabs than actual guitar cabs is another example, when I change my tech around I'm really just moving around the wet tone to get a sound specific to the genre I play (I.E I want vintage bass units for stoner metal, high-gain processors for something more modern etc.) So in essence... Even if Troy played in the same manner as me, and we had the same technical level, technique and sensibilities, I would get a much dirtier, aggressive, bassy tone from my set up and he would get a far more clear and sharp sound from his... So gear is important for tone | |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Of course, embed fail. Direct link to poor audio but awesome playing...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NXcx1sTpAY | ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
Shorter and slightly more ridiculous one with better audio:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMouQdQwS3k I have a violin too but I couldn't play that shit if I spent the rest of my life practicing. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
I hate this forum. Now the original embed is showing up.
No wonder I rarely go to rantsnflames, no editing sucks. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
i think, dear abacab, that you're missing their point due to their misuse of the word tone..
abacab is describing tone correctly troy and bodean are talking about "feel." There are certain players that will always sound like themselves on any instrument: jimi hendrix, b.b. king, les claypool, etc. These players often do exploit a certain "tone" that accentuates their "feel" (i.e. bb king with lucille), but if you put les claypool on a guitar, a violin, or a fucking drum kit, I would still know that that was les claypool. You can have a hundred different bassists who have studied John the Fisherman for years, put them on the same rig with the same bass, playing the same notes, yet you will know when it's les claypool. Tone can be copied or replicated for the most part. Some analogue audiophiles would argue that some tones are organic and impermanent, but you can almost replicate any analogue tone given enough resources and time. Feel on the other hand, is something that no amount of money and no amount of time can give you; you either have it or you don't.
__________________
![]() | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
not to say that tone can't be generated from a given players feel, but more that the feel, that essence of that player is a combination of more factors than tone (timing, technical skill, dexterity, etc.)
__________________
![]() | ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|