If you wear a mask for any reason

[Gwaihir]

pretty much

[cd288]

Data the CDC posted:

Increasing distance between spreader and receiver decreased the number of infectious particles inhaled. (Figure 1).

Cloth and surgical mask-wearing (respectively) at a distance of 50 cm (1.6 feet) resulted in (Figure 2):
- 57%–58% and 73%–76% decrease in viral load and infectious virus titer, respectively, received when the spreader was masked.
- 37%–50% and 17%–47% decrease in viral load and infectious virus titer, respectively, received when the receiver was masked.
- 60%–71% and 68%–76% decrease in viral load and infectious virus titer, respectively, received when both the spreader and the receiver were masked.


So basically, it's great when both people wear masks. They may not be as great at keeping you from getting sick, but they are definitely good for reducing viral load you may expel. And since so many people get it but are asymptomatic, it's good to wear the mask to ensure you aren't spreading it without your knowledge. We reduce the viral load being expelled and you just might be able to prevent someone who was in the same space from getting sick because the amount of viral load is really key in terms of whether someone gets sick when they inhale it.

[Mblake81]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

viral load being expelled

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Mead]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Data the CDC posted:

Increasing distance between spreader and receiver decreased the number of infectious particles inhaled. (Figure 1).

Cloth and surgical mask-wearing (respectively) at a distance of 50 cm (1.6 feet) resulted in (Figure 2):
- 57%–58% and 73%–76% decrease in viral load and infectious virus titer, respectively, received when the spreader was masked.
- 37%–50% and 17%–47% decrease in viral load and infectious virus titer, respectively, received when the receiver was masked.
- 60%–71% and 68%–76% decrease in viral load and infectious virus titer, respectively, received when both the spreader and the receiver were masked.


So basically, it's great when both people wear masks. They may not be as great at keeping you from getting sick, but they are definitely good for reducing viral load you may expel. And since so many people get it but are asymptomatic, it's good to wear the mask to ensure you aren't spreading it without your knowledge. We reduce the viral load being expelled and you just might be able to prevent someone who was in the same space from getting sick because the amount of viral load is really key in terms of whether someone gets sick when they inhale it.

You’re wasting your time. There’s no evidence you can provide to change their minds.

[solleks]

Theres evidence of everything evidence is meaningless. Did u know there is evidence we live on a flat plane, oh thats right u dont care just like i dont care about a satanic company called cdc or the numbers and words they present

[Mead]

Originally Posted by solleks [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Theres evidence of everything evidence is meaningless. Did u know there is evidence we live on a flat plane, oh thats right u dont care just like i dont care about a satanic company called cdc or the numbers and words they present

My point exactly

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Data the CDC posted:

Increasing distance between spreader and receiver decreased the number of infectious particles inhaled. (Figure 1).

Cloth and surgical mask-wearing (respectively) at a distance of 50 cm (1.6 feet) resulted in (Figure 2):
- 57%–58% and 73%–76% decrease in viral load and infectious virus titer, respectively, received when the spreader was masked.
- 37%–50% and 17%–47% decrease in viral load and infectious virus titer, respectively, received when the receiver was masked.
- 60%–71% and 68%–76% decrease in viral load and infectious virus titer, respectively, received when both the spreader and the receiver were masked.


So basically, it's great when both people wear masks. They may not be as great at keeping you from getting sick, but they are definitely good for reducing viral load you may expel. And since so many people get it but are asymptomatic, it's good to wear the mask to ensure you aren't spreading it without your knowledge. We reduce the viral load being expelled and you just might be able to prevent someone who was in the same space from getting sick because the amount of viral load is really key in terms of whether someone gets sick when they inhale it.

It's called the common cold. I'm willing to wager throughout history its served as the final nail in the coffin for old people on death's doorstep to a number in the range of several billion.

The scare and the differentiation of 2019 and 2020's common cold is aimed at leveraging an dying "boomer" generation's fear of pending death.

Your statistics are just words on a screen. Who fucking cares?

[kjs86z]

https://youtu.be/2DDXG-dHugc

[kjs86z]

Meanwhile in PA, they've now made it a law that you have to wear a face mask inside your own home if you have friends / family over for dinner.

PA state government control ordinance

imagine agreeing to this sort of liberal bullshit lmao

[Thulian]

Originally Posted by kjs86z [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The people that wear their masks everywhere are the same people that will be first in line for the vaccine.

Really hoping for immediate severe side effects and this blows up in big pharma's face.


btw - we developed covid 19 in parallel w/ the vaccine, released it in china to make them look bad, and have been using this manufactured crisis in the name of tremendous profits and increased government control

hope this helps

also lmao @ plinki's evade account going hard in the paint again

Covid19 is man made, and 10 years old. But the vaccine wont have side effects because its just an immune response. Unless your talking about Spudnick V Which i wouldnt trust

Originally Posted by solleks [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Only reason you have a job is because health care is government subsidized and forced on the population via ar15s and jail time. I predict you being laid off soon and probably sitting at home living off government money/food. Stay fat and gross

You are losing your shit

Originally Posted by solleks [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Theres evidence of everything evidence is meaningless. Did u know there is evidence we live on a flat plane, oh thats right u dont care just like i dont care about a satanic company called cdc or the numbers and words they present

If the world was flat no one would know, you are not allowed to travel to the north pole or antarctica your vessel will be stopped.

Originally Posted by kjs86z [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Meanwhile in PA, they've now made it a law that you have to wear a face mask inside your own home if you have friends / family over for dinner.

PA state government control ordinance

imagine agreeing to this sort of liberal bullshit lmao

How would you enforce this