Kyle Rittenhouse = Based God

[Bones]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

went there heavily armed to the chaos zone with a big target on his back to see wut happens. his intentions are plain unless you are a willful retard. he INTENDED to strut and peacock in front of the N-words and take a risk and now he's in over his head because guess what? those N-words are murderous slime when amygdalially provoked and his life and soul are shattered, however many sycophants from the dregs of the net he attracts.

not arguing that at all. IMO that is also what he was clearly doing. But it doesnt mean he was intending to actually "kill browns". Because if that was the case, he would have shot someone LONG before the point that was captured on video, before he started running for his life, fell down in the middle of the street and had 3 people rolling up on him with only 2 options left, get bludgeoned to death or shoot back in self defense. He did make the mistake of even putting himself in that situation but the evidence clearly shows he was defending himself at that point, as it was pretty clear his life was in imminent danger. Doing what he was doing and being a retard to get himself in that situation was oviously wrong, but doesn't justify the rioters in attacking him and threatening his life, no matter how bigotted or racist he was being to lead up to that situation, he was running away and THEY chased HIM.

No matter how bad the liberals want him to burn for it, there's actual video evidence this time that the whole world saw and the evidence shows clear self defense, which he will probably get acquitted, and then charged with something else less severe like instigating and public endagerment, but time will tell.

[zodium]

Originally Posted by Bones [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

not arguing that at all. IMO that is also what he was clearly doing. But it doesnt mean he was intending to actually "kill browns". Because if that was the case, he would have shot someone LONG before the point that was captured on video, before he started running for his life, fell down in the middle of the street and had 3 people rolling up on him with only 2 options left, get bludgeoned to death or shoot back in self defense. He did make the mistake of even putting himself in that situation but the evidence clearly shows he was defending himself at that point, as it was pretty clear his life was in imminent danger. Doing what he was doing and being a retard to get himself in that situation was oviously wrong, but doesn't justify the rioters in attacking him and threatening his life, no matter how bigotted or racist he was being to lead up to that situation, he was running away and THEY chased HIM.

No matter how bad the liberals want him to burn for it, there's actual video evidence this time that the whole world saw and the evidence shows clear self defense, which he will probably get acquitted, and then charged with something else less severe like instigating and public endagerment, but time will tell.

we did it. we found the one guy who hasn't heard about stochastic terrorism.

[JurisDictum]

Originally Posted by Bones [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

not arguing that at all. IMO that is also what he was clearly doing. But it doesnt mean he was intending to actually "kill browns". Because if that was the case, he would have shot someone LONG before the point that was captured on video, before he started running for his life, fell down in the middle of the street and had 3 people rolling up on him with only 2 options left, get bludgeoned to death or shoot back in self defense. He did make the mistake of even putting himself in that situation but the evidence clearly shows he was defending himself at that point, as it was pretty clear his life was in imminent danger. Doing what he was doing and being a retard to get himself in that situation was oviously wrong, but doesn't justify the rioters in attacking him and threatening his life, no matter how bigotted or racist he was being to lead up to that situation, he was running away and THEY chased HIM.

No matter how bad the liberals want him to burn for it, there's actual video evidence this time that the whole world saw and the evidence shows clear self defense, which he will probably get acquitted, and then charged with something else less severe like instigating and public endagerment, but time will tell.

We do agree, and still you feel compelled to write a paragraph explaining the self-defense in the most glorious prose you can muster. Point your heart at whatever it is that motivated you to write this to me. That's where your sin lies.

[JurisDictum]

man i went heavily armed into the LARPer mosh-pit and someone got killed, dam who coulda seen it coming..

That said, he gets off. It was self defense. Okay? Easy. Good riddance, never hire this miscreant. All involved are garbage.

[Bones]

not even close to the most glorious and motivating prose i could muster but nice try dude

I dont agree with what the kid did at all I made that clear

[Bones]

But I also dont agree with the people who attacked him and died, no matter how much of a racist asshole he might have been, they most likely would have killed him and that also would NOT have been justified.

You cant even see how your perspectives on this situation is also politically motivated, just as much as his actions were

[JurisDictum]

oh you see me wearing a blue hat, a mirage

maybe read the posts i just made or idk yeah anyway nice agreeing w u. why do you do it while hallucinating blue hats and couching the optics toward the right?[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Bones]

no not really, I do agree with most of what you said except that you think he was there deliberately as an "agent of chaos". Hes just a dumb 17 year old kid. My only main argument was that, while he may have been there instigating and just being a general asshat, I do not think he went there with the intention of killing anybody and ruining his entire life, but he got himself into a fucked up situation where it came down to his life vs the people he was instigating and decided to attack him violently.

[charmcitysking]

Originally Posted by Bones [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

no not really, I do agree with most of what you said except that you think he was there deliberately as an "agent of chaos". Hes just a dumb 17 year old kid. My only main argument was that, while he may have been there instigating and just being a general asshat, I do not think he went there with the intention of killing anybody and ruining his entire life, but he got himself into a fucked up situation where it came down to his life vs the people he was instigating and decided to attack him violently.

So the people who were rioting, looting and burning down private businesses were not the instigators?

Interesting take

[LazyHydras]

Originally Posted by charmcitysking [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So the people who were rioting, looting and burning down private businesses were not the instigators?

Interesting take

hot take. you heard it here, first, folks.