Horror Movie Thread

[Tankwipe]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

yes that is exactly how they got away with it. enjoy being unwitting accomplice to pedophilia promotion because of your Disney-fan-like attachment to certain franchises. read a book

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Luigi]

what is this about getting boners? I must have missed something

[Jibartik]

Is this thread becoming a horror movie in front of our very eyes?

[Skarne]

Haha looks like somebody is projecting

[Tankwipe]

Originally Posted by Skarne [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Haha looks like somebody is projecting

Right? "Oh no I found that child sexually arousing. I better get mad at everyone who saw it because how I feel is totally how everyone feels about it."

[Woke Locc]

Originally Posted by Tankwipe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Right? "Oh no I found that child sexually arousing. I better get mad at everyone who saw it because how I feel is totally how everyone feels about it."

I'm not sure which movie she means, but in the 90s I saw the one where the clown was secretly a spider and had children trapped in his webs.

Maybe steven king bad

[JurisDictum]

taln bout It 2017 FYI

only retards couldn't see the hollywood pedo overflow there [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] I think they justified it on set by saying the "pedo male gaze" was "horrifying" in itself. That was a sham argument the producers should not have accepted, and the publishers should have put the kibosh. But they deduced correctly that most people are like Tankwipe here. Anyway I know this is way over your heads.

[Skarne]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

taln bout It 2017 FYI

only retards couldn't see the hollywood pedo overflow there [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] I think they justified it on set by saying the "pedo male gaze" was "horrifying" in itself. That was a sham argument the producers should not have accepted. I know this is way over your heads.

Haha..dude take a midol

[JurisDictum]

Originally Posted by Woke Locc [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm not sure which movie she means, but in the 90s I saw the one where the clown was secretly a spider and had children trapped in his webs.

Maybe steven king bad

actually the book just had the dad character be abusive physically. It was the 2017 movie which edited the plot to make the dad character a pedo rapist -- to really telegraph the pedo thing, which is hinted at through the visual language of the entire film, to you nitwits.

The real problem wasn't the writing; it was the cinematographic language. Most movies in this festering culture sell cars, black guys and coca cola (above your head); this one sold the unclothed bodies of children. A number of match cuts come to mind which deliberately drew attention to children's body parts. I am not a genius and this was not exactly subtle; in fact I would argue you are a complete fucking retard if you didn't catch it. Do not breed or vote.

Again, I believe they were intentionally doing "pedo male gaze" as a deliberate "horror" thing, which I think is in awful taste since it doubles as porn for pedophiles. It was also outrage fuel to sell the movie. I understand that this is way beyond most of you at every single turn.

anyway Stephen King is fine.

[Woke Locc]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

actually the book just had the dad character be abusive physically. It was the 2017 movie which edited the plot to make the dad character a pedo rapist -- to really telegraph the pedo thing, which is hinted at through the visual language of the entire film, to you nitwits.

The real problem wasn't the writing; it was the cinematographic language. Most movies in this festering culture sell cars, black guys and coca cola (above your head); this one sold the unclothed bodies of children. A number of match cuts come to mind which deliberately drew attention to children's body parts. I am not a genius and this was not exactly subtle; in fact I would argue you are a complete fucking retard if you didn't catch it. Do not breed or vote.

Again, I believe they were intentionally doing "pedo male gaze" as a deliberate "horror" thing, which I think is in awful taste since it doubles as porn for pedophiles. It was also outrage fuel to sell the movie. I understand that this is way beyond most of you at every single turn.

anyway Stephen King is fine.

I haven't seen the 2017 movie, that's just the first one.

King bad.