![]() |
|
View Poll Results: See thread title | |||
Bard |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
37 | 34.91% |
Ranger |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
39 | 36.79% |
Other (please give your faulty reasoning) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
23 | 21.70% |
Keep twin towers as is. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 12.26% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 106. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
However, I do feel like it's a bit of a false dilemma: it's an offensively oriented class joining a defensively oriented group. A Paladin would be much happier if the Shaman was swapped for a Mage or Necromancer or just another Rogue. And in general full groups are boring. What if we cut the Shaman and just go Enchanter/Cleric/Tank? Suddenly this calculation gets a lot more interesting. The Enchanter won't have enough mana to cc, slow every mob, and still charm a boss pet. As far as joining this trio it depends a lot on how critical the splits are. In a tough area, probably SK > MNK > WAR > PAL > BRD > RNG. In an easier area, maybe BRD > PAL > WAR > SK > RNG > MNK. | |||
Last edited by Raev; 03-22-2019 at 11:02 AM..
|
|
#52
|
|||
|
![]() lol at people saying ranger
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxx View Post I tried my hand at rotating with the casuals. It was at this point I decided to no longer be kind to the casuals as they have extreme short term memory. They did this to themselves, unfortunately. Quote: Originally Posted by Maner View Post No one in A/A cares that you aren't getting pixels. In fact after the last suspension wave the attitude is to stop letting the casual guilds get anything even remotely of value. | ||
|
#53
|
|||
|
![]() https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=108428
See this in defense of the pally post. Classic. | ||
|
#54
|
|||
|
![]() Rangers start with a handicap. They’re “dps” with snap agro. If you get enough gear, you’re a pretty good dps medium/light tank with snap agro. Getting to that second point takes a long time and I doubt many have ever played with that type of ranger. Rangers get pretty good.
| ||
|
#55
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
This is true. Most people aren’t willing to put in the time and effort to get a ranger to where they’re really really good. Getting all the toys like 2 lightning swords isn’t easy unless you’re rich or raid a lot. Same goes for sky cloak and big ac items. Curious how much better rangers will be with new defense skills next patch. | |||
|
#56
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#57
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
That's right! Defence buff is a ranger DPS nerf!! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | |||
|
#58
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Another witty, informative, and/or retarded post by:
![]() "You know you done fucked up when Yendor gives you raid commentary." - Tiggles | |||
|
#59
|
|||
|
![]() Smiled at that, Jimjam. And dead on, Yendor. We get an atk boost, too, yeah? +dps / +def good patch for us!
| ||
|
#60
|
|||
|
![]() I remember one time I was in HoT on my shaman and a racnar stuck to me like glue after I slowed it. The rest of the raid was busy getting debuffed by a bouncing shimmer drake and/or eaten by a wurm or something, so I just kind of chained torpor and chloroblast for quite a while while the racnar ate me. I didn't even die, though I probably wished I did once I started getting post-shimmer drake tells for buffs.
Also the other week I was in Field of Bone doing AoE slows and tanking for groups at the newbie ramp. Somehow I didn't die doing this either. Clearly shamans are the best tank.
__________________
Kefkef - 60 Oracle <BDA>
| ||
|
![]() |
|
|